Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BADLEY, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by WOOD, P. H. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BADLEY, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by WOOD, P. H. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1978 British Society for Rheumatology


research-article

GOUT AND SERUM URIC ACID LEVELS IN THE COTSWOLDS

ELIZABETH M. BADLEY, JEREMY S. MEYRICK and PHILIP H. N. WOOD

The Arthritis and Rheumatism Council Epidemiology Research Unit, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road Manchester M 13 9PT, and Bourton-on-the-Water, Gloucestershire

Correspondence to: Requests for reprints to Dr. E. M. Badley

A Cotswold population has been studied to investigate the prevalence of gout and its relation to the distribution of serum uric acid (SUA) levels. In the survey 3892 respondents aged 35 years and over were seen, a completion rate of 85 %. 147 of the 3872 respondents for whom information on rheumatic complaints was available reported gout, a frequency of 3.8 %. The condition could be established in only 35 of these, yielding an overall prevalence of gout of 0.93%. This is somewhat higher than has been reported previously, but various factors make it difficult to say whether this is a true impression and the prevalence may be of the same order as had been found in U.S.A. studies. The mean of the distribution of SUA levels is of the same order as that reported from other Caucasian populations. Various possible environmental factors which might contribute to the higher prevalence of gout in the Cotswolds were investigated, such as source of the water supply, social class, and length of residence in the area, but none was found to be associated. Gout was more frequent in locally born respondents, but consideration of place of birth of the respondents' parents failed to support the idea that high prevalence might be an hereditary characteristic of the indigenous population. An excess of respondents were currently taking diuretics of the thiazide type, but how much these drugs contributed to the development of gout is uncertain. An excess of gouty respondents were taking medication for coronary heart disease.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.