Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CURREY, H. L. F.
Right arrow Articles by MURRAY, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CURREY, H. L. F.
Right arrow Articles by MURRAY, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1979 British Society for Rheumatology


research-article

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF LOW BACK PAIN

H. L. F. CURREY1,, R. M. GREENWOOD2, G. G. LLOYD3 and R. S. MURRAY4

1Department of Rheumatology, The London Hospital Medical College London E1 2AD
2Division of Medical Computing, Clinical Research Centre Harrow HA1 3UJ
3Academic Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiartry Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF
4Radiodiagnostic Department, The London Hospital London E1 1BB

Correspondence to: Requests for reprints to Dr. H. L. F. Currey.

Consecutive patients attending hospital for the first time with backache were entered into a prospective study, provided that certain defined causes (infective, neoplastic, metabolic and inflammatory etc.) were not apparent at the first visit. Amongst 188 available for analysis, 65% were discharged and 28% defaulted, together making a total of 93% who ‘recovered uneventfully’ (in the sense that they were no longer attending hospital) on average in about three months, 4% came to ‘myelography’ (radiculography using Dimer-X or Amipaque) including 2% to discectomy, 1.5% proved to have treatable underlying diseases accounting for their backache while 1.5% became ‘qchronic attenders’. Information available at the first visit (patient characteristics, history, examination, radiographs and psychological questionnaire) provided few pointers to what the outcome would be or how long the patient would attend hospital. In particular, routine X-ray examination did not provide clues to any important conditions not already suspected by the clinicians. A case is made for reserving routine radiography for patients who have not recovered within about three months.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.