Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COOPER, H.
Right arrow Articles by STEELE, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by COOPER, H.
Right arrow Articles by STEELE, V. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1981 British Society for Rheumatology


research-article

USE AND MISUSE OF THE TAPE-MEASURE AS A MEANS OF ASSESSING MUSCLE STRENGTH AND POWER

H. COOPER1, W. N. DODDS, I. D. ADAMS, F. T. DE DOMBAL and V. A. STEELE

Sports Clinic, St. James's University Hospital Beckett Street, Leeds

Correspondence to: 1Requests for reprints to Mrs. Helen Cooper, 91 Leeds Road, Liversedge, West Yorkshire WF15 6JA

The tape-measure is frequently used by the medical profession to assess muscle function following injury. It is assumed that increasing limb girth is reflected by increasing muscle power and strength; but this assumption is empirical and may not in practice be justified. The relationship between thigh circumference and muscle strength and power, measured as the torque produced on an isokinetic dynamometer, was assessed in 64 subjects—24 non-injured sportsmen and 40 injured sportsmen. The correlation between the torque produced at the knee by the knee extensors and flexors and the thigh circumference at three levels was not significant in either group. Comparison of the injured with the non-injured limb also failed to show any correlation.

By contrast, in eight subjects, repeated measurements over a six to eight month period showed a significant relationship between change in thigh circumference and change in quadriceps power.

It is concluded that a single measurement of circumference at the same point in both thighs of a subject with unilateral injury should not be used as an assessment of muscle function. Serial measurements, however, at the 5 and 10 cm levels may be of value as an index of quadriceps power. Reasons for this are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.