Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RHYMER, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by DAURIO, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RHYMER, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by DAURIO, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1982 British Society for Rheumatology


research-article

A DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL COMPARING INDOMETHACIN SUSTAINED RELEASE CAPSULES (INDOCID-R) WITH INDOMETHACIN CAPSULES IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

A. R. RHYMER, C. B. HART and C. DAURIO

Merck Sharp&Dohme Research Laboratories Rahway, New Jersey, U.S.A. 07065

Correspondence to: Requests for reprints to Dr. A.R. Rhymer

A double–blind, controlled and completely randomized trial was conducted in four European rheumatology clinics. Eighty–six patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and prior treat–ment of at least six months' duration with indomethacin 150 mg/day were studied. Comparisons of the clinical efficacy, tolerability and safety of a new, oral, sustained–release formulation of indomethacin were made with a conventional formulation of indomethacin. In all clinical indices of response, the indomethacin sustained–release 75 mg capsule b.i.d. was found to provide relief of symptoms similar to the conventional 50 mg capsule t.i.d. The incidence of overall adverse clinical and laboratory effects was comparable for the two treatments.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.