Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CROFT, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CROFT, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 British Society for Rheumatology

research-article

OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN MEASURING ELEVATION AND EXTERNAL ROTATION OF THE SHOULDER

P. CROFT*, D. POPE*, R. BOSWELL*, A. RIGBY{dagger}, A. SILMAN* and Primary Care Rheumatology Society Shoulder Study Group{ddagger}

*ARC Epidemiology Research Unit, University of Manchester Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT
{dagger}Nuffield Institute for Health, University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9PL

The aim of the study was to assess the observer variation between trained primary care physicians in their assessment of two key shoulder movements: elevation and external rotation.

Six observers each examined and recorded their visual estimate of the range of movements in six patients assessed in random order. There was good agreement on the range of passive elevation assessed to the start of pain (if present): intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.84, and to the point of maximum elevation: ICC = 0.95. There was no evidence of an important systematic bias between observers. By contrast, external rotation was poorly reproducible: ICC = 0.43, with important systematic differences between observers.

In the second experiment, six observers simultaneously witnessed a range of movements in a single volunteer subject, and the agreement on their visual estimation of the angles achieved was assessed. There was a marked reduction in the systematic bias in external rotation, but agreement was still poor. Agreement for elevation remained high with a reduction in the small amount of bias observed in the first experiment when variability in both examination and visual assessment had been investigated.

We conclude that shoulder elevation is a reliable measurement for use in multicentre studies by trained primary care physicians. By contrast, external rotation is poorly reproducible because of systematic variation in examination technique and random variation in visual assessment.

KEY WORDS: Shoulder, Primary care, Epidemiology, Range of movement, Repeatability

{ddagger}Members of the group who participated in the repeatability studies were: N. Curzon, S. Hull, R. Gadsby, I. Wheeler, I. Robertson, P. Aeberhard and O. Thurtle.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann Rheum DisHome page
A J K Ostor, C A Richards, A T Prevost, B L Hazleman, and C A Speed
Interrater reproducibility of clinical tests for rotator cuff lesions
Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2004; 63(10): 1288 - 1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
J. D. Placzek, S. C. Lukens, S. Badalanmenti, P. J. Roubal, D. C. Freeman, K. M. Walleman, A. Parrot, and J. M. Wiater
Shoulder Outcome Measures: A Comparison of 6 Functional Tests
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2004; 32(5): 1270 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
A. F. Hoeksma, A. M. ter Steeg, P. Dijkstra, R. G.H.H. Nelissen, A. Beelen, and B. A. de Jong
Shoulder Contracture and Osseous Deformity in Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Injuries
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 29, 2003; 85(2): 316 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Rheum DisHome page
J L Hoving, R Buchbinder, S Green, A Forbes, N Bellamy, C Brand, R Buchanan, S Hall, M Patrick, P Ryan, et al.
How reliably do rheumatologists measure shoulder movement?
Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2002; 61(7): 612 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.