Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BLANCH, J.
Right arrow Articles by CHINES, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BLANCH, J.
Right arrow Articles by CHINES, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 British Society for Rheumatology


research-article

PREGNANCY-ASSOCIATED OSTEOPOROSIS: REPORT OF TWO CASES WITH LONG-TERM BONE DENSITY FOLLOW-UP

J. BLANCH*, R. PACIFICI{dagger} and A. CHINES{ddagger}

*Unitat d'Osteoporosi, Servei de Reumatologia, Hospital del Mar Barcelona, Spain
{dagger}Division of Endocrinology and Bone Metabolism, The Jewish Hospital of St. Louis, Missouri USA
{ddagger}Department of Medicine ‘D’, Wolfson Medical Centre Holon, Israel

Correspondence to: J. Blanch, Unitat d'Osteoporosi, Servei de Reumatologia, Hospital del Mar, Po Marítim 25-29, Barcelona 08003, Spain

Pregnancy-associated osteoporosis is a rare and poorly characterized clinical entity. We describe two women, aged 28 and 31 yr, who developed vertebral osteopaenia with non-traumatic compression fractures within a few months after delivery. In both women secondary causes of osteoporosis were excluded and routine laboratory data including indices of calcium metabolism were normal. In one patient (Patient 1) spontaneous secretion of IL-1 by cultured blood monocytes was elevated 6 months after delivery and a bone biopsy revealed histomorphometric indices consistent with accelerated bone remodelling. BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and/or dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In Patient 1, BMD, measured with QCT, 6 months after delivery was 3.32 Z-score units below the predicted value for age and sex-matched subjects. At that time treatment (phosphate followed by sodium etidronate) was instituted, and QCT measurements obtained 24 and 30 months after delivery revealed a BMD of –2.98 and –2.67 Z-score units, respectively. The treatment was discontinued just before she became pregnant again, and 3 months after the second delivery QCT showed a BMD of –3.06 Z-score units. Further BMD assessments were obtained with DXA at 15 and 18 months after the second delivery, and the BMD values were –1.41 and –1.08, respectively. In Patient 2, spine BMD, measured with QCT, 4 and 10 months after delivery were –1.68 and –1.59 Z-score units, respectively. At 10, 16 and 22 months after delivery, BMD was assessed with DXA. The initial measurement with this technique disclosed a BMD of 0.52 Z-score units. Subsequent assessments showed no further significant changes in spine BMD. Although coherent treatment in Patient 1 might have affected BMD, the present long-term study suggests that post-partum osteoporosis is not progressive and possibly, partially, reversible. Further pregnancies need not be contraindicated; however, BMD monitoring is required to assess future fracture risk.

KEY WORDS: Pregnancy, Osteoporosis, Bone density


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. Alonso-Burgos, P. Royo, L. Diaz, and J. D. Aquerreta
Labor-Related Sacral and Pubic Fractures. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2007; 89(2): 396 - 398.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
V Breuil, O Brocq, L Euller-Ziegler, and A Grimaud
Insufficiency fracture of the sacrum revealing a pregnancy associated osteoporosis. First case report
Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 1997; 56(4): 278b - 278.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.