Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DAVIES, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by HILLARBY, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DAVIES, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by HILLARBY, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 British Society for Rheumatology


research-article

RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS OF HLA-DQA AND COMPLEMENT C4A LOCI IN DETERMINING SUSCEPTIBILITY TO SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

E. J. DAVIES*,{dagger},, G. STEERS*, W. E. R. OLLIER{dagger}, D. M. GRENNAN{ddagger}, R. G. COOPER§, E. M. HAY{dagger} and M. C. HILLARBY*

*University of Manchester Rheumatic Diseases Centre, Hope Hospital Eccles Old Road, Salford M6 8HD
{dagger}ARC Epidemiology Research Unit, Stopford Building, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT
{ddagger}Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
§Department of Rheumatology, Pinderfields NHS Trust Aberford Road, Wakefield, W. Yorks

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: E. J. Davies, ARC Epidemiology Research Unit, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT.

The objective of this study was to reassess the role of C4A null alleles in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) susceptibility after taking into account the association of DQA*0501 with this disease. The frequency of C4A null alleles in 82 SLE patients and 59 controls was determined using both immunofixation and a Taql RFLP method. HLA-DQA and DQB alleles were identified by sequence-specific oligonuclcotide typing. Empirical logistic analysis was used to assess the interactive effects of C4 and DQA alleles. It was found that the strongest association with SLE was for the combination of DQA*0501 and C4A*Q0 [odds ratio (OR) = 5.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5–11.7]. Both DQA*0501 (P = 0.02) and C4A*Q0 (P = 0.03) appeared to have significant individual effects on SLE susceptibility, with a significant statistical interaction between the two loci (P = 0.01). However, when anti-La antibody negative patients were examined only C4A*Q0 had a significant individual effect (P = 0.04). A significant statistical interaction between DQA*0501 and C4A*Q0 was again detected (P = 0.02). These results support the hypothesis that susceptibility to SLE is influenced by several genes with differing functions: HLA-DQA*0501 may predispose to autoantibody formation while C4A*Q0 impairs immune complex clearance.

KEY WORDS: Systemic lupus erythematosus, Major histocompatibility complex, Complement


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
H. Miyagawa, M. Yamai, D. Sakaguchi, C. Kiyohara, H. Tsukamoto, Y. Kimoto, T. Nakamura, J.-H. Lee, C.-Y. Tsai, B.-L. Chiang, et al.
Association of polymorphisms in complement component C3 gene with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus
Rheumatology, February 1, 2008; 47(2): 158 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
K. E. Sullivan, A. F. Jawad, L. M. Piliero, N. Kim, X. Luan, D. Goldman, and M. Petri
Analysis of polymorphisms affecting immune complex handling in systemic lupus erythematosus
Rheumatology, March 1, 2003; 42(3): 446 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
M. C. Pickering and M. J. Walport
Links between complement abnormalities and systemic lupus erythematosus
Rheumatology, February 1, 2000; 39(2): 133 - 141.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.