Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HELSLOOT, J.
Right arrow Articles by STURGESS, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HELSLOOT, J.
Right arrow Articles by STURGESS, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 British Society for Rheumatology


research-article

ANTINEUTROPHIL CYTOPLASMIC ANTIBODIES IN INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS—POTENTIAL FOR MISDIAGNOSIS?

J. HELSLOOT*, S. VIRGO{dagger}, L. McGUIGAN* and A. STURGESS*,

*Department of Rheumatology Sydney 2217, Australia
{dagger}Southpath, St George Hospital Sydney 2217, Australia

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: A. Sturgess, St George Hospital, Sydney 2217, Australia.

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) are well described in Wegener's granulomatosis and some forms of vasculitis. They have also been described in patients with arthritis, but the specificity of these ANCA and their relationship to the presence of vasculitis, antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and granulocyte-specific ANA (GS-ANA), and to disease activity are uncertain. We studied 101 patients with forms of inflammatory arthritis and detected four cytoplasmic ANCA, eight perinuclear ANCA and 16 atypical ANCA. There was no association between the presence of ANCA and ANA or rheumatoid factor. No anti-PR3 antibodies were found and no strong anti-myeloperoxidase antibodies were detected. Four GS-ANA were detected and were distinct from ANCA. There was no association between rheumatoid arthritis disease activity or disability and ANCA status. ANCA did not predict vasculitis over a 3 yr follow-up. These ANCA appear to be epiphcnomcna. Their importance lies in their potential to mislead physicians towards a misdiagnosis of vasculitis.

KEY WORDS: ANCA, Wegener's granulomatosis, Vasculitis, RA, Myeloperoxidase, Proteinase 3


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
O. Vittecoq, F. Jouen-Beades, K. Krzanowska, I. Bichon-Tauvel, J. F. Menard, A. Daragon, D. Gilbert, F. Tron, and X. Le Loet
Prospective evaluation of the frequency and clinical significance of antineutrophil cytoplasmic and anticardiolipin antibodies in community cases of patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology, May 1, 2000; 39(5): 481 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
M C Nash and M J Dillon
Antineutrophil cytoplasm antibodies and vasculitis
Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 1997; 77(3): 261 - 264.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.