Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by POPE, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by SELMAN, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by POPE, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by SELMAN, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 British Society for Rheumatology


research-article

THE FREQUENCY OF RESTRICTED RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN INDIVIDUALS WITH SELF-REPORTED SHOULDER PAIN: RESULTS FROM A POPULATION-BASED SURVEY

D. P. POPE, P. R. CROFT*, C. M. PRTTCHARD, G. J. MACFARLANE and A. J. SELMAN

ARC Epidemiology Research Unit, University of Manchester Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT
*University of Keele, School of Postgraduate Medicine, Industrial and Community Health Research Centre Thomburrow Drive, Hartshill, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 7QB

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: A. J. Silman, ARC Epidemiology Research Unit, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT

Prevalence studies suggest that shoulder pain is very common (7–20%) in the adult population, though little is known about the severity and impact of such pain. Disability results, in part, from the restriction of movement and we therefore determined the frequency of restricted shoulder movement in individuals in a general population sample reporting shoulder pain and associated disability. In all, 232 individuals were interviewed about shoulder pain and related disability, and their range of shoulder movement in the following planes was measured: elevation, forward flexion, backward flexion, external rotation and internal rotation, together with the minimum difference achieved between the tip of a thumb and the spinous process of C7. In total, 48 (21%) subjects reported current pain and disability in one or both shoulders. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, cut-offs for restricted movements were selected at the point of maximal discrimination between painful and pain-free shoulders. There was considerable overlap in the distribution of range of movement, at all six sites, between these two groups. The highest positive predictive value for pain was observed in restriction of the thumb to cervical spine movement (53%), but this also had the lowest negative predictive value. By contrast, the highest negative predictive value was observed for restriction of external rotation (96%). Restriction in any plane was observed in 77% of those individuals with pain, but was also present in half of those without pain. In summary, most people with self-reported shoulder pain in the community do not have widespread restriction of movement. Reduction in external rotation was the most discriminatory, but it is necessary to examine movement in multiple planes to assess the true burden of shoulder pain in the community.

KEY WORDS: Shoulder restriction pain, Cross-sectional studies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
W. J. A. Grooten
Predictors for persistent neck/shoulder pain, medical care-seeking due to neck/shoulder pain and sickness absence
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2007; 21(7): 648 - 659.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
A. J. K. Ostor, C. A. Richards, A. T. Prevost, C. A. Speed, and B. L. Hazleman
Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care
Rheumatology, June 1, 2005; 44(6): 800 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
J L Hoving, R Buchbinder, S Green, A Forbes, N Bellamy, C Brand, R Buchanan, S Hall, M Patrick, P Ryan, et al.
How reliably do rheumatologists measure shoulder movement?
Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2002; 61(7): 612 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. Kirkley, S. Griffin, H. McLintock, and L. Ng
The Development and Evaluation of a Disease-Specific Quality of Life Measurement Tool for Shoulder Instability: The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 1998; 26(6): 764 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
D. P Pope, P. R Croft, C. M Pritchard, and A. J Silman
Prevalence of shoulder pain in the community: the influence of case definition
Ann Rheum Dis, May 1, 1997; 56(5): 308 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.