Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NEWMAN, J.
Right arrow Articles by SILMAN, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NEWMAN, J.
Right arrow Articles by SILMAN, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 British Society for Rheumatology

other

A COMPARISON OF DISEASE STATUS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS ATTENDING AND NOT ATTENDING A SPECIALIST CLINIC

J. NEWMAN and A. J. SILMAN

ARC Epidemiology Research Unit, University of Manchester Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: A. J. Silman

The objective was to test the hypothesis that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients currently not receiving specialist care have milder and less active disease than clinic attenders. The subjects were recruited from a media campaign aimed at identifying RA patients for a nationwide twin study. All subjects were interviewed at home and examined. Data from serological and radiological investigations were obtained. Data were also obtained about any specialist care, including the date, where relevant, of the most recent hospital appointment. For subjects reporting ever attending a specialist clinic, the current status (discharged/under current care) and the date of their most recent appointment were verified from hospital records. Data from 149 patients were analysed, of whom 114 (76%) were current hospital clinic attenders at the time of interview, 10 (7%) had never attended and 25 (17%) were ex-attenders. There was a similar proportion with current morning stiffness (> 1 h) in all three groups (60%). The median number of (i) swollen (S) joints, (ii) tender (T) joints and (iii) swollen and tender (ST) joints was almost identical—current attenders: (S) 7, (T) 9, (ST) 11; ex-attenders: (S) 5, (T) 8, (ST) 10; never attenders: (S) 7, (T) 14, (ST) 17. There were similar proportions with radiological erosions in the current and ex-attenders (79 and 72%, respectively). Current attenders were, however, substantially more likely to be taking disease-modifying drugs. In these volunteer patients, those currently managed entirely in primary care did not have less severe or active disease.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Disease status, Clinic attenders, Non-attenders


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C. J. Edwards, N. K. Arden, D. Fisher, J. C. Saperia, I. Reading, T. P. Van Staa, and C. Cooper
The changing use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis from the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database
Rheumatology, November 1, 2005; 44(11): 1394 - 1398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. L. Scott, C. Antoni, E. H. Choy, and P. C. L. M. van Riel
Joint counts in routine practice
Rheumatology, August 1, 2003; 42(8): 919 - 923.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.