Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SMITH, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by SCOTT, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SMITH, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by SCOTT, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 British Society for Rheumatology

other

THE CLINICAL NEED FOR AN ACUTE RHEUMATOLOGY REFERRAL SERVICE

E. C. SMITH, H. BERRY and D. L. SCOTT

Department of Rheumatology, Denmark Hill, King's College Hospital London SE5 9RS

Should rheumatologists provide an acute referral service for general practitioners (GPs) and other clinical units? Is it cost effective? We prospectively studied acute referrals to one unit over 10 months, recording their source, diagnosis, management and outcome. Current rheumatology patients and cases only needing telephone advice were excluded. There were 253 referrals: 82 from GPs, nine from Accident and Emergency, and 162 from other hospital units. Their diagnoses comprised connective tissue diseases (22), back pain (46), inflammatory arthritis (59), osteoarthritis (22), paediatric cases (11), soft tissue problems (41) and 52 other disorders. Thirty-two needed active treatment within 24 h (classified as emergencies); examples included cerebral lupus, vasculitic pulmonary haemorrhage, retroperitoneal lymphoma with sacral plexus compression, temporal arteritis with reduced visual acuity and acute monoarthritis. All needed immediate therapy; only one died. Most (176 cases) were less urgent and needed advice in 48 h. Examples included osteoporotic vertebral collapse and acute rheumatoid disease. Forty-five could have been seen routinely; examples included lateral epicondylitis and adhesive capsulitis. The service required 1 day per week of medical staff time at an average cost of £45 per case. We concluded that an acute rheumatology service is needed; it can be provided within the working day and is cost effective.

KEY WORDS: Acute rheumatology, Emergency referrals, Acute referrals


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C. Roberts, E. A. Dolman, A. O. Adebajo, and M. Underwood
A national qualitative survey of community-based musculoskeletal services in the UK
Rheumatology, September 1, 2003; 42(9): 1074 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C. Roberts, A. O. Adebajo, and S. Long
Improving the quality of care of musculoskeletal conditions in primary care
Rheumatology, May 1, 2002; 41(5): 503 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.