Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Rheumatology, Vol 36, 43-49, Copyright © 1997 by British Society for Rheumatology


ORIGINAL PAPERS

Effects of disease and corticosteroids on appendicular bone mass in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with axial measurements

JC Martin, R Munro, MK Campbell and DM Reid
Department of Rheumatology, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill.

The potential value of measurements of peripheral bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as an assessment of long-term disease activity has recently received renewed attention. This study examines the effects of RA and corticosteroid therapy on newer methods of measuring peripheral bone mass, comparing the results with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at axial sites. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the radius, ultrasound of the calcaneus, and DXA of the hip and spine were compared between 29 controls and 46 women with RA of whom 25 were receiving low-dose corticosteroid therapy. Bone mass was significantly reduced in the RA groups for: (i) radial trabecular (36.1%) and total (15.6%) measurement sites; (ii) calcaneal ultrasound attenuation (31.7%) and velocity (6.6%); and (iii) femoral neck (15.4%) bone mineral density. Lumbar spine and radial cortical measurements were not significantly affected. There were no significant differences between the RA groups. Disease activity and physical activity did appear to be responsible for much of the reduction in bone mass. These results demonstrate that RA is associated with significant bone loss at the hip, radius and calcaneus, but not at the lumbar spine. In this small study, low-dose corticosteroids had little additional deleterious effect.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
E. Torikai, Y. Kageyama, M. Takahashi, M. Suzuki, T. Ichikawa, T. Nagafusa, and A. Nagano
The effect of infliximab on bone metabolism markers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology, June 1, 2006; 45(6): 761 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
W B Jawaid, D Crosbie, J Shotton, D M Reid, and A Stewart
Use of digital x ray radiogrammetry in the assessment of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis
Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2006; 65(4): 459 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
E. Toussirot, N. U. Nguyen, G. Dumoulin, F. Aubin, J.-P. Cedoz, and D. Wendling
Relationship between growth hormone-IGF-I-IGFBP-3 axis and serum leptin levels with bone mass and body composition in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology, January 1, 2005; 44(1): 120 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
M C Lodder, Z de Jong, P J Kostense, E T H Molenaar, K Staal, A E Voskuyl, J M W Hazes, B A C Dijkmans, and W F Lems
Bone mineral density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: relation between disease severity and low bone mineral density
Ann Rheum Dis, December 1, 2004; 63(12): 1576 - 1580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
A Hakkinen, T Sokka, H Kautiainen, A Kotaniemi, and P Hannonen
Sustained maintenance of exercise induced muscle strength gains and normal bone mineral density in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a 5 year follow up
Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2004; 63(8): 910 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
R E Orstavik, G Haugeberg, T Uhlig, P Mowinckel, T K Kvien, J A Falch, and J I Halse
Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density: discriminatory ability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and controls with and without vertebral deformities
Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2004; 63(8): 945 - 951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
H Forsblad d'Elia, A Larsen, E Waltbrand, G Kvist, D Mellstrom, T Saxne, C Ohlsson, E Nordborg, and H Carlsten
Radiographic joint destruction in postmenopausal rheumatoid arthritis is strongly associated with generalised osteoporosis
Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2003; 62(7): 617 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
S. S. Yeap and D. J. Hosking
Management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis
Rheumatology, October 1, 2002; 41(10): 1088 - 1094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
P Roben, R Barkmann, S Ullrich, A Gause, M Heller, and C-C Gluer
Assessment of phalangeal bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by quantitative ultrasound
Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2001; 60(7): 670 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
T. K Kvien, G. Haugeberg, T. Uhlig, J. A Falch, J. I Halse, W. F Lems, B. A C Dijkmans, and A. D Woolf
Data driven attempt to create a clinical algorithm for identification of women with rheumatoid arthritis at high risk of osteoporosis
Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2000; 59(10): 805 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
I.-M. Gilboe, T. K Kvien, G. Haugeberg, and G. Husby
Bone mineral density in systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison with rheumatoid arthritis and healthy controls
Ann Rheum Dis, February 1, 2000; 59(2): 110 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.