Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Somerville, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Somerville, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, D. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Rheumatology, Vol 36, 1113-1115, Copyright © 1997 by British Society for Rheumatology


ORIGINAL PAPERS

Neoral--new cyclosporin for old?

MF Somerville and DG Scott
Rheumatology Department, Norfolk & Norwich Health Care NHS Trust, Norwich.

Cyclosporin A is now well established as an effective second-line drug to treat rheumatoid arthritis. In April 1995, the microemulsion-based formulation of cyclosporin (Neoral) was introduced based on its increased bioavailability at 'no extra cost'. There may have been concerns that with increased bioavailability of Neoral, some patients might experience increased toxicity, particularly if transferring from Sandimmun to Neoral at the same dose. We describe our experience of 51 patients treated with Neoral--39 with rheumatoid arthritis, six with psoriatic arthritis and the remainder with a variety of diseases, including Behcet's, systemic lupus erythematosus and juvenile chronic arthritis. All patients continued their other medication including non- steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and analgesics. Five continued low dose prednisolone (average 7.5 mg per day) all patients were monitored for safety and efficacy throughout their treatment according to standard protocol. Five patients were enrolled in a study of efficacy and safety where the dose of cyclosporin was reduced to 2.5 mg/kg/day at the time of conversion, i.e. to Neoral 2.5 mg/kg/day; 19 patients were converted dose for dose, cyclosporin A dose range 2.5-4 mg/kg/day converted to Neoral dose range 2.5-4 mg/kg/day and 27 patients started Neoral de novo. We conclude that cyclosporin is a useful disease modifying anti-rheumatic agent, and our experience suggests that the new formulation, Neoral, has a similar safety and efficacy profile to the original preparation (Sandimmun). Neoral was relatively easy to manage and we noted a slight reduction in dose when compared to Sandimmun. With dose adjustments over 18 months the mean dose for patients with RA fell from 3.2 to 2.7 mg/kg/day and of the 27 patients starting Neoral de novo only seven required an increased dose above 2.5 mg/kg/day in order to establish efficacy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
T K Kvien, H K Zeidler, P Hannonen, F A Wollheim, O Forre, I Hafstrom, J P Kaltwasser, M Leirisalo-Repo, B Manger, L Laasonen, et al.
Long term efficacy and safety of cyclosporin versus parenteral gold in early rheumatoid arthritis: a three year study of radiographic progression, renal function, and arterial hypertension
Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2002; 61(6): 511 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
D J Kilmartin, J V Forrester, and A D Dick
Cyclosporin A therapy in refractory non-infectious childhood uveitis
Br J Ophthalmol, July 1, 1998; 82(7): 737 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.