Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Menninger, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rau, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Menninger, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rau, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Rheumatology, Vol 37, 1060-1068, Copyright © 1998 by British Society for Rheumatology


ORIGINAL PAPERS

A 36 month comparative trial of methotrexate and gold sodium thiomalate in the treatment of early active and erosive rheumatoid arthritis

H Menninger, G Herborn, O Sander, J Blechschmidt and R Rau
Department of Medicine I, Bavarian Red Cross Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bad Abbach, Germany.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) and gold sodium thiomalate (GSTM) in patients with active early erosive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during 3 yr. METHODS: A total of 174 patients from two centres were randomly assigned to receive weekly i.m. injections of either 15 mg MTX or 50 mg GSTM for 1 yr in a double-blind fashion. Thereafter, the study was continued as an open prospective trial for an additional 2 yr with the same dose of MTX and half of the GSTM dose. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were carried out at baseline and at months 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 in all patients, including withdrawals. RESULTS: An intention-to-treat analysis revealed inactivation ['clinical remission': no swollen/tender joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of < 20 mm/h in males and < 30 mm in females, no corticosteroids within the last 4 weeks] in 33.3% of MTX patients and 37.9% of GSTM patients. The mean time to inactivation was insignificantly shorter with GSTM (MTX: 12.1 months; GSTM: 9.1 months; P = 0.06). At least marked improvement (> 50% reduction of the number of swollen/tender joints and of the ESR) was found in 78.2% (MTX) and 87.4% (GSTM). Withdrawal from the study due to toxicity was recorded in 16.1% of MTX and 52.9% of GSTM patients after a mean time of 30.6 and 6.1 months, respectively (P = 0.0001). In MTX and GSTM non-completers, inactivation was recorded in 24.2 and 54.7% of all patients. Among completers (54 and 34 patients, respectively), significant improvement compared to baseline was noted in all seven clinical variables (morning stiffness, overall joint pain, count of tender/swollen joints, Lansbury articular score, functional score and grip strength), ESR and C- reactive protein without significant intergroup differences. The steroid-sparing effect appeared more pronounced with GSTM. CONCLUSION: Over 36 months, treatment with MTX or GSTM induces inactivation ('clinical remission') of early and erosive RA in about one-third and at least marked improvement in four-fifths of patients (intention-to- treat analysis). Patients withdrawn from MTX or GSTM due to toxicity develop a clinical remission from the disease; this occurred more often with GSTM. Tolerability is significantly better with MTX.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
C Salliot and D van der Heijde
Long-term safety of methotrexate monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature research
Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2009; 68(7): 1100 - 1104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
B Combe, R Landewe, C Lukas, H D Bolosiu, F Breedveld, M Dougados, P Emery, G Ferraccioli, J M W Hazes, L Klareskog, et al.
EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis: report of a task force of the European Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT)
Ann Rheum Dis, January 1, 2007; 66(1): 34 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
R. Rau, G. Herborn, H. Menninger, and O. Sangha
Radiographic outcome after three years of patients with early erosive rheumatoid arthritis treated with intramuscular methotrexate or parenteral gold. Extension of a one-year double-blind study in 174 patients
Rheumatology, February 1, 2002; 41(2): 196 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
M. A. Quinn, P. G. Conaghan, and P. Emery
The therapeutic approach of early intervention for rheumatoid arthritis: what is the evidence?
Rheumatology, November 1, 2001; 40(11): 1211 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
J Hamilton, I B McInnes, E A Thomson, D Porter, J A Hunter, R Madhok, and H A Capell
Comparative study of intramuscular gold and methotrexate in a rheumatoid arthritis population from a socially deprived area
Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2001; 60(6): 566 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
J M C Albers, L Paimela, P Kurki, K B Eberhardt, P Emery, M A van `t Hof, F H J M Schreuder, M Leirisalo-Repo, and P L C M van Riel
Treatment strategy, disease activity, and outcome in four cohorts of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis
Ann Rheum Dis, May 1, 2001; 60(5): 453 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
A. Schattner
A new era in rheumatoid arthritis treatment--time to introduce a modified treatment pyramid
QJM, November 1, 2000; 93(11): 757 - 760.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
O. Sander, G. Herborn, E. Bock, and R. Rau
Prospective six year follow up of patients withdrawn from a randomised study comparing parenteral gold salt and methotrexate
Ann Rheum Dis, May 1, 1999; 58(5): 281 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.