Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hauselmann, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Michel, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hauselmann, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Michel, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Rheumatology, Vol 37, 1110-1117, Copyright © 1998 by British Society for Rheumatology

ORIGINAL PAPERS

Can collagen type II sustain a methotrexate-induced therapeutic effect in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis? A double-blind, randomized trial

HJ Hauselmann, M Caravatti, B Seifert, K Wang, P Bruckner, G Stucki and BA Michel
Department of Rheumatology and Physical Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.

OBJECTIVE: Based on the results of two recently published, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled studies, a possible improvement in rheumatoid arthritis disease activity after oral tolerization with triple helical collagen type II has been suggested. The goal of this study was to go one step further and ask the question whether collagen type II can sustain the therapeutic effect induced by methotrexate, the most widely accepted disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Ninety-two patients with rheumatoid arthritis on stable therapy with methotrexate were enrolled in a 3 month double-blind, randomized and comparative study to examine the efficacy of oral triple helical collagen type II as compared to continuing methotrexate. The dose of methotrexate (or the respective placebo drug) and of concomitant corticosteroids was not changed and intra-articular corticosteroids were not allowed during the 3 months. The primary study endpoint was disease activity as measured by physician and patients. RESULTS: While patients under ongoing therapy with methotrexate had, as expected, no change in disease activity, almost all parameters of disease activity and outcome in patients under a daily oral dose of 0.5 mg triple helical collagen type II worsened significantly (highly significant difference in swollen joints, between the two groups, P < 0.0001). No significant differences in side-effects between the two groups during the study period could be demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Substitution of methotrexate with daily 0.5 mg of triple helical collagen type II in patients with rheumatoid arthritis leads to a significant increase in disease activity, suggesting that oral collagen type II at the given dose is not capable of sustaining the methotrexate-induced anti-inflammatory effect in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
E. Uitz, J. Fransen, T. Langenegger, G. Stucki, and f. t. m. o. t. S. C. Q. M. i. R. A.
Clinical quality management in rheumatoid arthritis: putting theory into practice
Rheumatology, May 1, 2000; 39(5): 542 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.