Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chappard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Roux, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chappard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Roux, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Rheumatology, Vol 37, 496-501, Copyright © 1998 by British Society for Rheumatology

ORIGINAL PAPERS

Clinical evaluation of spine morphometric X-ray absorptiometry

C Chappard, S Kolta, J Fechtenbaum, M Dougados and C Roux
Centre d'Evaluation des Maladies Osseuses, Hopital Cochin, Paris, France.

A new method for vertebral height measurements, morphometric X-ray absorptiometry (MXA) based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, has been proposed. This technique overcomes some limitations of morphometric radiography (MRX): the effective radiation dose is low, some sources of geometric distortion are eliminated, such as dependence on patient position, magnification gradient, and the effect of scoliosis is minimized. The purpose of this study was to compare morphometric parameters obtained by both methods (MXA and MRX), and to evaluate the agreement between morphometric evaluations and qualitative reading for vertebral fracture diagnosis. The evaluation was performed with an Hologic QDR 2000 device in 67 women without vertebral fractures and 31 women with vertebral fractures (according to a qualitative assessment). The reproducibility of the image analysis was <4% and comparable to MRX. The estimated bias between the two methods was on average 10 mm, and was a function of the vertebral height, according to the Bland and Altman method. The agreement between MXA and other methods for vertebral fracture diagnosis was poor for the thoracic level above T7, due to a lack of resolution and rib interposition. Agreement was also low for T10, due to the motion of the diaphragm muscle. MXA cannot currently be used for the diagnosis of thoracic vertebral fracture in clinical practice. Technological improvements are necessary to make this promising method useful as a screening tool to evaluate the presence of thoracic vertebral fractures.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J A Rea, G M Blake, and I Fogelman
Development of a phantom for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2001; 74(880): 341 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.