Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (37)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Heijde, D.
Right arrow Articles by Boers, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Heijde, D.
Right arrow Articles by Boers, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 1999; 38: 941-947
© 1999 British Society for Rheumatology

Reliability and sensitivity to change of a simplification of the Sharp/van der Heijde radiological assessment in rheumatoid arthritis

D. van der Heijde, T. Dankert, F. Nieman, R. Rau1 and M. Boers2

University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands,
1 Evangelisches Fachkrankenhaus, Ratingen, Germany and
2 Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: D. van der Heijde, Department of Rheumatology, Division of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Objective. To determine the reliability and sensitivity to change of a simplified radiological scoring method [simple erosion narrowing score (SENS)] for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SENS was compared to the Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS) as a gold standard.

Methods. Sets of seven radiographs of hands and feet were taken of 20 RA patients with a wide spectrum of radiological damage. For 14 patients, these seven radiographs were taken during a follow-up period of 5 yr, and for six patients during a follow-up of 10 yr. Each set of radiographs was scored twice by the same observer (DvdH). Erosions and joint space narrowing were scored with SHS (range 0–448) in 32 and 30 joints in the hands, respectively, and both in 12 joints in the feet. SENS gives a score of 1 if there is any erosion in a joint and also 1 if there is any narrowing in the joint (range 0–86). In each case, SENS was derived from SHS. To analyse data, generalizability theory and repeated measurements ANOVA were used.

Results. The overall reliability coefficient was 0.81 for SHS and 0.80 for SENS. Intra-observer reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)] was 0.99 and 0.98 for SHS and SENS, respectively. The ICC for the sensitivity to change was 0.84 for SHS and 0.88 for SENS. The smallest detectable difference (SDD) could be determined for both methods. The presence of progression based on this SDD was very comparable between the two methods.

Conclusion. The measurement properties of SENS are good and comparable to SHS. This makes SENS suitable for use in clinical practice and in large (epidemiological) studies, especially in the first years of disease.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Radiological assessment, Sharp/van der Heijde score, Simplification, Reliability, Sensitivity to change.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
A. Baillet, E. Payraud, V.-A. Niderprim, M. J. Nissen, B. Allenet, P. Francois, L. Grange, P. Casez, R. Juvin, and P. Gaudin
A dynamic exercise programme to improve patients' disability in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Rheumatology, April 1, 2009; 48(4): 410 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
P. Durez, V. Fraselle, F. Houssiau, J.-L. Thonnard, H. Nielens, and M. Penta
Validation of the ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2007; 66(8): 1098 - 1105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
S Boini and F Guillemin
Radiographic scoring methods as outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis: properties and advantages
Ann Rheum Dis, September 1, 2001; 60(9): 817 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.