Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salaffi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ferraccioli, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salaffi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ferraccioli, G. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2000; 39: 90-96
© 2000 British Society for Rheumatology

Discriminating ability of composite indices for measuring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of the Chronic Arthritis Systemic Index, Disease Activity Score and Thompson's articular index

F. Salaffi, M. Peroni and G. F. Ferraccioli1

Department of Rheumatology, University of Ancona, Ancona and
1 Division of Rheumatology—DPMSC, School of Medicine, Udine, Italy

Correspondence to: F. Salaffi, Department of Rheumatology, University of Ancona, Ospedale A. Murri, Via dei Colli 52, 60035 Jesi (Ancona), Italy.

Objective. To compare the discriminating ability of the chronic arthritis systemic index (CASI), an index that uses the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) as the main variable, with the disease activity score (DAS) and Thompson's articular index (TAI) to detect high and low disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods. Two hundred and two RA patients were examined. According to criteria proposed previously, they were divided into two subgroups: those with active disease and those with low activity. The areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the CASI in comparison with the DAS and TAI for the discrimination of disease activity.

Results. The difference between areas under the ROC curves of the CASI and TAI (0.897±0.023 vs 0.780±0.032) and between the DAS and TAI (0.933±0.018 vs 0.780±0.032) was highly significant (P=0.0001), thus reflecting the accuracy of the diagnostic assessment. No difference arose between areas under the ROC curves of the CASI and the DAS (difference between areas=0.036±0.022; P=0.103).

Conclusion. The CASI discriminates just as well between high and low disease activity as does the DAS. Either index consisting of more than one variable performs better than TAI. We conclude that even including the HAQ, a severity parameter in the long term, it is possible to construct an index that, at any time point, evaluates disease activity as well.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Chronic arthritis systemic index, Disease activity score, Thompson's articular index, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Discriminating ability


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
F. Salaffi, E. Filippucci, M. Carotti, E. Naredo, G. Meenagh, A. Ciapetti, V. Savic, and W. Grassi
Inter-observer agreement of standard joint counts in early rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with grey scale ultrasonography a preliminary study
Rheumatology, January 1, 2008; 47(1): 54 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
B. Tengstrand, K. Carlstrom, and I. Hafstrom
Bioavailable testosterone in men with rheumatoid arthritis--high frequency of hypogonadism
Rheumatology, March 1, 2002; 41(3): 285 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.