Rheumatology 2000; 39: 382-388
© 2000 British Society for Rheumatology
The reliability of the three-dimensional FASTRAK measurement system in measuring cervical spine and shoulder range of motion in healthy subjects
1 Centre for Health Planning & Management, Darwin Building, Keele University,
2 Department of Mathematics, Mackay Building, Keele University,
3 Primary Care Sciences Research Centre and Department of Physiotherapy Studies, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG and
4 Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, The Haywood, High Lane, Burslem, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST6 7AG, UK
Objectives. To assess the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of a new three-dimensional measurement system, the FASTRAK, in measuring cervical spine flexion/extension, lateral flexion and rotation and shoulder flexion/extension, abduction and external rotation in healthy subjects.
Methods. The study was conducted in two parts. One part assessed inter-observer reliability with two observers measuring 40 subjects. The other part assessed intra-observer reliability with one observer measuring 32 subjects on three occasions. All subjects had unrestricted, pain-free cervical spine and shoulder movement. Reliability was measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(2,1)].
Results. The inter-observer ICCs for the cervical spine ranged from 0.61 to 0.89 and for the shoulder from 0.68 to 0.75. After removal of outliers, all ICCs were above 0.70. Intra-observer ICCs for the cervical spine ranged from 0.54 to 0.82 and for the shoulder from 0.62 to 0.81. After removal of outliers, all ICCs were above 0.70 except for shoulder abduction (0.62).
Conclusions. Whilst all movements measured by the FASTRAK showed good reliability, the reliability of the whole movement in a plane (e.g. left plus right lateral flexion) was better than for the separate movements (e.g. left and right lateral flexion taken separately). Inter-observer reliability was generally better than intra-observer reliability for most cervical spine movements, suggesting that variability of movement within subjects (e.g. over a period of days) for these movements was greater than variability between measures on the same occasion.
KEY WORDS: Cervical spine, Shoulder, Range of motion, FASTRAK, Reliability.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J L Hoving, R Buchbinder, S Green, A Forbes, N Bellamy, C Brand, R Buchanan, S Hall, M Patrick, P Ryan, et al. How reliably do rheumatologists measure shoulder movement? Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2002; 61(7): 612 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H M Vermeulen, M Stokdijk, P H C Eilers, C G M Meskers, P M Rozing, and T P M V. Vlieland Measurement of three dimensional shoulder movement patterns with an electromagnetic tracking device in patients with a frozen shoulder Ann Rheum Dis, February 1, 2002; 61(2): 115 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Jordan, K. Dziedzic, R. Mullis, P. T. Dawes, and P. W. Jones The development of three-dimensional range of motion measurement systems for clinical practice Rheumatology, October 1, 2001; 40(10): 1081 - 1084. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|