Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bellucci, G.
Right arrow Articles by Seedhom, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bellucci, G.
Right arrow Articles by Seedhom, B. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Right arrow Experimental Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2001; 40: 1337-1345
© 2001 British Society for Rheumatology


Original Papers

Mechanical behaviour of articular cartilage under tensile cyclic load

G. Bellucci and B. B. Seedhom

Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Leeds, 36 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9NZ, UK

Introduction. Although fatigue has been implicated in cartilage failure, there are only two published studies in this area, by the same author. However, in these previous studies cartilage was tested in the direction parallel to that of collagen orientation in the superficial layer, where it possesses greater tensile strength. In the present work, articular cartilage was also tested along the direction perpendicular to that of the collagen. Furthermore, the study investigated topographic and zonal variations in the fatigue behaviour of cartilage from the human knee.

Methods. Specimens were tested in a specially constructed apparatus that allowed the number of cycles at specimen failure, as well as the load and elongation of the specimen, to be monitored for each specimen. To date, some 72 specimens have been tested, all from the same knee joint, though from different sites and at different depths within the cartilage layer.

Results and conclusions. The most impressive of the outcomes of this study is the scatter of the data. Considering all the specimens used, the range of number of load cycles to failure was between 2 and 1.5 million. The zonal variation in fatigue behaviour was similar to that in tensile modulus reported previously; the surface and deep layers seemed to have better fatigue properties whether tested in the direction parallel or perpendicular to that of the collagen in the superficial layer. The middle layer was far weaker, suggesting that highly packed and ordered fibres in the surface and deep zones have better mechanical properties than the more random and loose fibres in the middle zone. The variation in fibre organization through the cartilage thickness was also reflected in the differences observed in the elongation of the specimen during the test. The surface and deep zones had a higher stiffness than the middle zone. Cartilage had better fatigue resistance when the specimen was loaded in a direction parallel rather than perpendicular to the collagen within the surface layer. This was true whether specimens were harvested from the superficial, intermediate or deep layer. There were many factors that confounded attempts to estimate the likely fatigue life from the data obtained in such a study.

KEY WORDS: Articular cartilage, Fatigue, Tensile cyclic loading.

Correspondence to: B. B. Seedhom, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Leeds, 36 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9NZ, UK


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.