Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, W.
Right arrow Articles by McPherson, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, W.
Right arrow Articles by McPherson, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Right arrow Diagnostics and Imaging Procedures
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2001; 40: 757-762
© 2001 British Society for Rheumatology


Original Papers

Evidence for inadequate construct validity of the Disease Repercussions Profile in people with rheumatoid arthritis

W. Taylor, J. Myers, H. McNaughton and K. McPherson

Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Wellington School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand

Objective. To re-evaluate the construct validity of the Disease Repercussions Profile (DRP), a measure of handicap in arthritis populations.

Methods. We used the multitrait–multimethod approach to determine convergent and discriminant validity in a postal survey of randomly selected patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had attended the Wellington Regional Rheumatology Unit since 1988. Respondents (n=142) completed the following self-report instruments: Disease Repercussions Profile, EuroQol EQ-5D, Health Assessment Questionnaire, London Handicap Scale and WHOQOL-BREV.

Results and conclusions. The pattern of correlation supported the construct validity of the dichotomous response question (DRP domain affected or not) for the activity and relationships domain, provided ambiguous support for the appearance and emotion domain and no support for the social and financial domains. There was no support for construct validity of any of the domains on the importance rating part of the DRP. We suggest that the DRP be interpreted cautiously in aggregated group data.

KEY WORDS: Disease Repercussions Profile, Construct validity, Rheumatoid arthritis, Handicap.

Correspondence to: W. J. Taylor, Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Wellington School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
L. Goodacre, J. Smith, D. Meddis, and J. Goodacre
Development and validation of a patient-centred Measure of Activity Limitation (MAL) in rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology, April 1, 2007; 46(4): 703 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
P P Katz, A Morris, and E H Yelin
Prevalence and predictors of disability in valued life activities among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis
Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2006; 65(6): 763 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
L Sharpe, F Denton, and L Schrieber
Validity of the Disease Repercussion Profile in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus, June 1, 2004; 13(6): 428 - 435.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
L. Sharpe, T. Sensky, W. J. Taylor, and K. McPherson
Validity of the Disease Repercussion Profile
Rheumatology, August 1, 2002; 41(8): 945 - 946.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.