Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mannion, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Dvorak, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mannion, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Dvorak, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Spinal Pain
Right arrow Rehabilitation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2001; 40: 772-778
© 2001 British Society for Rheumatology


Original Papers

Comparison of three active therapies for chronic low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up

A. F. Mannion, M. Müntener1, S. Taimela2 and J. Dvorak

Department of Neurology, Schulthess Clinic, Zürich,
1 Institute of Anatomy, University of Zürich, Switzerland and
2 DBC International, Vantaa, Finland

Objectives. To examine the relative efficacy of three active therapies for patients with chronic low back pain.

Methods. One hundred and forty-eight subjects with chronic low back pain were randomized to receive, twice weekly for 3 months, (i) active physi otherapy, (ii) muscle reconditioning on training devices, or (ii) low-impact aerobics. Questionnaires were administered to assess pain intensity, pain frequency and disability before and after therapy and at 6 and 12 months of follow-up.

Results. One hundred and thirty-two of the 148 patients (89%) completed the therapy programmes and 127 of the 148 (86%) returned a questionnaire at all four time-points. The three treatments were equally efficacious in significantly reducing pain intensity and frequency for up to 1 yr after therapy. However, the groups differed with respect to the temporal changes in self-rated disability over the study period (P=0.03): all groups showed a similar reduction after therapy, but for the physiotherapy group disability increased again during the first 6 months of follow-up whilst the other two groups showed a further decline. In all groups the values then remained stable up to the 12-month follow-up. The larger group size and minimal infrastructure required for low-impact aerobics rendered it considerably less expensive to administer than the other two programmes.

Conclusions. The introduction of low-impact aerobic exercise programmes for patients with chronic low back pain may reduce the enormous costs associated with its treatment.

KEY WORDS: Chronic low back pain, Exercise, Aerobics, Back reconditioning, Physiotheraphy, Disability.

Correspondence to: A. F. Mannion, Department of Neurology, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008 Zürich, Switzerland.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
L. G Macedo, C. G Maher, J. Latimer, and J. H McAuley
Motor Control Exercise for Persistent, Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2009; 89(1): 9 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. A. Hayden, M. W. van Tulder, A. V. Malmivaara, and B. W. Koes
Meta-Analysis: Exercise Therapy for Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Ann Intern Med, May 3, 2005; 142(9): 765 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
E. W Vogel
Physiotherapy, aerobics, and training devices reduced pain intensity and frequency in chronic low back pain
Evid. Based Med., March 1, 2002; 7(2): 56 - 56.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.