Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, A.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, A.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2001; 40: 1044-1051
© 2001 British Society for Rheumatology


Original Papers

One-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of an educational–behavioural joint protection programme for people with rheumatoid arthritis

A. Hammond and K. Freeman1

Rheumatology Department, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, Derby and
1 School of Physiotherapy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Objective. Joint protection aims to reduce pain and local inflammation, preserve the integrity of joint structures and improve function. There is evidence that it can improve pain and function in the short term, but the long-term effects are uncertain. This study evaluated the effects of joint protection in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods. A randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial of duration 1 yr was conducted. Two interventions (both 8 h) were compared: standard arthritis education, including 2.5 h of joint protection education based on typical UK practice; and a joint protection arthritis education programme, using educational–behavioural teaching methods. Assessments were made at entry and 6 and 12 months.

Results. Sixty-five people with RA attended the joint protection programme and 62 the standard programme. The groups were matched for age (51 and 49 yr), disease duration (21 and 17.5 months) and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. In comparison with the standard group, the joint protection group significantly improved with respect to adherence to the joint protection programme (P=0.001), hand pain (P=0.02), general pain (P=0.05), early morning stiffness (P=0.01), self-reported number of disease flare-ups (P=0.004), visits to the doctor for arthritis (P<0.01), and the AIMS2 (Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales) activities of daily living scale (P=0.04). A trend to improved swollen joint counts was identified (P=0.07). Within-group analyses also showed improvements in arthritis self-efficacy and perceived control. Hand deformity scores continued to increase in both groups.

Conclusion. We found significant improvements in adherence, pain, disease status and functional ability amongst those attending the joint protection programme. Benefits became more apparent with time, suggesting that joint protection can help slow the progression of the effects of RA over and above the effects of drug therapy.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Joint protection, Patient education, Occupational therapy.

Correspondence to: A. Hammond, Rheumatology Department, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, London Road, Derby DE1 2QY, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L. Scobbie, S. Wyke, and D. Dixon
Identifying and applying psychological theory to setting and achieving rehabilitation goals
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2009; 23(4): 321 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic IllnessHome page
K. Berzins, S. Reilly, J. Abell, J. Hughes, and D. Challis
UK self-care support initiatives for older patients with long-term conditions: a review
Chronic Illness, March 1, 2009; 5(1): 56 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
A. Hammond, J. Bryan, and A. Hardy
Effects of a modular behavioural arthritis education programme: a pragmatic parallel-group randomized controlled trial
Rheumatology, November 1, 2008; 47(11): 1712 - 1718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
T. P. M. Vliet Vlieland
Non-drug care for RA is the era of evidence-based practice approaching?
Rheumatology, September 1, 2007; 46(9): 1397 - 1404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
R. Marks and J. P. Allegrante
A Review and Synthesis of Research Evidence for Self-Efficacy-Enhancing Interventions for Reducing Chronic Disability: Implications for Health Education Practice (Part II)
Health Promot Pract, April 1, 2005; 6(2): 148 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A Hammond and K Freeman
The long-term outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of an educational-behavioural joint protection programme for people with rheumatoid arthritis
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2004; 18(5): 520 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. Bodenheimer, K. Lorig, H. Holman, and K. Grumbach
Patient Self-management of Chronic Disease in Primary Care
JAMA, November 20, 2002; 288(19): 2469 - 2475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
K Freeman, A Hammond, and N B Lincoln
Use of cognitive-behavioural arthritis education programmes in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2002; 16(8): 828 - 836.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.