Rheumatology 2002; 41: 1346-1356
© 2002 British Society for Rheumatology
Review |
Evidence from clinical trials and long-term observational studies that disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs slow radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: updating a 1983 review
1 Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 203 Oxford House, Nashville, TN 37232-4500, USA,
2 Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, DPMSC, School of Medicine of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy,
3 Jyvaskyla Central Hospital, 40620 Jyvaskyla, Finland,
4 Rheumatology Department, Kongsvinger Sjukehus, N-2226 Kongsvinger, Norway,
5 Evangelisches Fachkrankenhaus, Rheumaklinik, Rosenstrasse 2, D-40882 Ratingen, Germany,
6 Division of Rheumatology, Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center Campus, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH 44109-1998 and
7 Wichita Arthritis Center, 1035 North Emporia, #230, Wichita, KS 67214, USA
Earlier reports, including a comprehensive 1983 review, had indicated that slowing of radiographic progression was relatively unusual in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using traditional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. However, in recent years, slowing of radiographic progression has been documented in a number of clinical trials, as well as long-term observational studies, with use of (in alphabetical order) adalimumab, anakinra, corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin, etanercept, gold salts, infliximab, leflunomide, methotrexate and sulphasalazine. At this time, disease modification is a realistic goal in the clinical care of patients with RA. Documentation of improved long-term outcomes requires long-term observational data over 520 yr to supplement data from randomized controlled clinical trials over 624 months.
Correspondence to: T. Pincus, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, 203 Oxford House, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. M. Wessels, T. W. J. Huizinga, and H.-J. Guchelaar Recent insights in the pharmacological actions of methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatology, March 1, 2008; 47(3): 249 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Park, Weng Kee Wong, M. Oh, D. Khanna, R. H. Gold, J. T. Sharp, and H. E. Paulus Classifying radiographic progression status in early rheumatoid arthritis patients using propensity scores to adjust for baseline differences Statistical Methods in Medical Research, February 1, 2007; 16(1): 13 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Pincus and T. Sokka How aggressive should initial therapy for rheumatoid arthritis be? Rheumatology, January 1, 2005; 44(1): 133 - 134. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kaarela, M. Hakala, P. Hannonen, H. Kautiainen, M. Korpela, M. Leirisalo-Repo, R. Luosujarvi, R. Luukkainen, T. Mottonen, and K. Puolakka How aggressive should initial therapy for rheumatoid arthritis be? The Finnish experience Rheumatology, January 1, 2005; 44(1): 134 - 135. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Larsson, H. Erlandsson Harris, A. Larsson, B. Mansson, T. Saxne, and L. Klareskog Corticosteroid treatment of experimental arthritis retards cartilage destruction as determined by histology and serum COMP Rheumatology, April 1, 2004; 43(4): 428 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

