Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dawes, P. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dawes, P. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diagnostics and Imaging Procedures
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2002; 41: 189-195
© 2002 British Society for Rheumatology

Original Papers

The mechanical joint score: a new clinical index of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis

A. H. Johnson1, A. B. Hassell, P. W. Jones2, D. L. Mattey, J. Saklatvala and P. T. Dawes

Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, Stoke-on-Trent ST6 7AG,
1 Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX and
2 Department of Mathematics, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent ST5 5BG, UK

Objectives. To evaluate the mechanical joint score (MJS) in terms of its reliability between observers and over time, its ease of use and its relationship with conventional measures of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity, severity and functional outcome.

Methods. The MJS was evaluated in 103 patients with reference to the following joints: total proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints, total metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, wrists, elbows, shoulders, hips, knees, ankles and total metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints. The score was based on the appearance of the joints on a scale of 0–3, 0 representing no abnormality and 3 severe abnormality or previous surgery. The MJS was evaluated in terms of its intra- and inter-observer variability and its content, construct and criterion validities. A subset of 29 patients were re-evaluated after 5 yr to examine change in MJS over time.

Results. The MJS performed well in terms of inter-observer and intra-observer reliability. The MJS showed strong correlation with the Larsen X-ray score of hands and feet (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.74) and with the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.56) and only weak correlation with indices of disease activity, such as the Ritchie index and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The MJS showed highly significant positive change over time.

Conclusion. The MJS is a reliable clinical index of joint damage and may be a useful new outcome measure in RA.

KEY WORDS: Mechanical joint score, Rheumatoid arthritis, Outcome measure, Joint damage.

Correspondence to: A. B. Hassell, Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, Stoke-on-Trent ST6 7AG, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
J. Highton, V. Markham, T. C. A. Doyle, and P. L. Davidson
Clinical characteristics of an anatomical hand index measured in patients with rheumatoid arthritis as a potential outcome measure
Rheumatology, May 1, 2005; 44(5): 651 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. K. Bunn, L. Shepstone, L. M. Galpin, N. J. Wiles, and D. P. M. Symmons
The NOAR Damaged Joint Count (NOAR-DJC): a clinical measure for assessing articular damage in patients with early inflammatory polyarthritis including rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology, December 1, 2004; 43(12): 1519 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.