Rheumatology 2002; 41: 268-273
© 2002 British Society for Rheumatology
Original Papers |
Computerized information-gathering in specialist rheumatology clinics: an initial evaluation of an electronic version of the Short Form 36
Department of Rheumatology, Division of Immunity and Infection and
1 CRC Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT and
2 Department of Rheumatology, Dudley Group of Hospitals NHS Trust, The Guest Hospital, Tipton Road, Dudley, West Midlands DY1 4SE, UK
Objectives. Longitudinal outcome data are important for research and are becoming part of routine clinical practice. We assessed an initial version of an electronic Short Form 36 (SF-36), a well-established health assessment questionnaire, in comparison with standard paper forms, in two specialist rheumatology clinics.
Methods. Out-patients (20 with systemic lupus erythematosus and 31 with vasculitis) were randomly selected to complete either paper (n=29) or electronic and paper SF-36 versions (n=51) before and after consultation (paper vs paper comparison). Data were evaluated as the response correlation, internal consistency, missing data, patient satisfaction and preference.
Results. There were very good correlations in SF-36 responses (P<0.001) between the paper and electronic forms and the paper and paper forms. Internal reliability coefficients (Cronbach's
) showed good internal consistency for all reported responses in either computer or paper forms. There were no missing data in the computerized version but 24% of patients failed to answer all of the paper form questions. Ease of use of the computer version was rated highly by 71% of all the respondents, and 69% would prefer to use the computer version in future.
Discussion. Computerized data collection is acceptable to patients and feasible in clinical settings. It provides responses that are at least comparable to those to the paper form, improves data capture and is available immediately.
KEY WORDS: Rheumatology, Systemic lupus erythematosus, Vasculitis, SF-36, Electronic data capture, Quality of life.
Correspondence to: A. S. Wilson.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. G. Matthew, K. L. Currie, P. Ritvo, R. Nam, M. E. Nesbitt, R. W. Kalnin, and J. Trachtenberg Personal Digital Assistant Data Capture: The Future of Quality of Life Measurement in Prostate Cancer Treatment J. Oncol. Pract, May 1, 2007; 3(3): 115 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ammentorp, A. M. Rasmussen, B. Norgaard, E. Kirketerp, and P.-E. Kofoed Electronic questionnaires for measuring parent satisfaction and as a basis for quality improvement Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2007; 19(2): 120 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Greenwood, A. J. Hakim, E. Carson, and D. V. Doyle Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatology, January 1, 2006; 45(1): 66 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schaeren, H. A. Bischoff-Ferrari, M. Knupp, W. Dick, J. F. Huber, and R. Theiler A computer touch-screen version of the North American Spine Society outcome assessment instrument for the lumbar spine J Bone Joint Surg Br, February 1, 2005; 87-B(2): 201 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S P Young, E Henderson, D L Cheseldine, A S Wilson, J Skan, S Heaton, S J Bowman, D Situnayake, P A Bacon, T R Southwood, et al. Development and assessment of a World Wide Web site for systemic lupus erythematosus patient information Lupus, August 1, 2002; 11(8): 478 - 484. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||




