Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLauchlan, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLauchlan, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, D. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2002; 41: 375-380
© 2002 British Society for Rheumatology


Original Papers

Sacral and iliac articular cartilage thickness and cellularity: relationship to subchondral bone end-plate thickness and cancellous bone density

G. J. McLauchlan* and D. L. Gardner1,

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Princess Margaret Rose Hospital, Frogston Road West, Edinburgh EH10 7ED and
1 Department of Pathology, University Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK

Objectives. To measure the thickness and cellularity of adult human sacral and iliac articular cartilages and the thickness and density of the subchondral bones.

Methods. The right sacroiliac joints of 15 adult patients were examined post-mortem. HOME (Highly Optimized Microscope Environment) microscopy was used to measure articular cartilage and subchondral bone end-plate thickness. Conventional morphometric techniques were employed to estimate cartilage cellularity and cancellous bone density.

Results. Sacral articular cartilage was thicker than iliac (1.81 vs 0.80 mm, P<0.001). Iliac cartilage cell density in all zones was higher than sacral. The overall mean was 31.19x10-3 vs 23.23x10-3/mm3, P<0.001. Superficial zones contained more cells than middle and deep zones but there were large differences between the cell numbers of the middle and deep zones of both sacral and iliac cartilages. Iliac subchondral bone end-plates were thicker than sacral (0.36 vs 0.23 mm, P<0.001). The thickness of these plates was related inversely to that of the overlying articular cartilages. Iliac subchondral cancellous bone was twice as dense as sacral (22.07 vs 12.05%, P<0.001), a ratio recognized anteriorly, centrally and posteriorly.

Conclusions. Adult human sacral cartilage is thick and of low cell density. It rests upon a thin bone end-plate supported by porous, cancellous bone. Iliac cartilage and bone display the converse proportions. The identification of these variables may assist understanding of normal sacroiliac joint function and the interpretation of tissue changes in the spondylarthropathies.

KEY WORDS: Sacroiliac joint, Cartilage, Bone, Morphometry, HOME microscopy, Laser scanning microscopy.

* Present address: Orthopaedic and Rheumatology Directorate, Chorley and South Ribble District General Hospital, Preston Road, Chorley PR7 1PP, UK.

Correspondence to: D. L. Gardner.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.