Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Guerrero, J.
Right arrow Articles by Soto-Rojas, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Guerrero, J.
Right arrow Articles by Soto-Rojas, A. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sjogren's Syndrome
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2002; 41: 381-389
© 2002 British Society for Rheumatology


Original Papers

The wafer test: a semi-quantitative test to screen for xerostomia

J. Sánchez-Guerrero, E. Aguirre-García, M. R. Pérez-Dosal, A. Kraus, M. H. Cardiel and A. E. Soto-Rojas

Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, 14000 México, D.F. Mexico

Objective. To develop a screening test for xerostomia.

Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 152 healthy subjects aged <20–60 yr, 30 patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome and 60 patients with other connective tissue diseases, sampled randomly. A validated screening questionnaire for sicca syndrome and the Schirmer-1 and wafer tests were carried out in all subjects. In addition, non-stimulated whole salivary flow was measured in a random sample of 113 participants. The main outcome was the time of dissolution of the wafer.

Results. Time of dissolution of the wafer was 2.8±2.1 min in the healthy group, 3.3±1.5 min in the connective tissue diseases group, and 9.2±3.9 min in the primary Sjögren's syndrome group (P<0.001). The correlation coefficient between the wafer test and non-stimulated whole salivary flow was -0.60 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.47, -0.71]. A cut-off value of 4 min (‘wafer 4’) showed sensitivity of 92.9%, specificity of 71.7%, a positive predictive value of 31.7%, a negative predictive value of 98.6%, accuracy of 74.3%, an ROC (receiver operating curve) value of 82.3 and a likelihood ratio of 3.3 (95% CI 2.3, 4.6) for xerostomia. The proportion of patients with wafer 4 was 8% in the healthy group, 23% in the connective tissue diseases group and 93% in the primary Sjögren's syndrome group (P<0.001). Wafer 4 was a significant predictor of xerostomia after controlling for age, gender, temperature and relative humidity.

Conclusion. The wafer test is valid and reliable for identifying subjects with xerostomia.

KEY WORDS: Xerostomia, Screening, Sicca syndrome, Sjögren's syndrome.

Correspondence to: J. Sánchez-Guerrero, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga 15, 14000 México, D.F. Mexico.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
A. CHEN, Y. WAI, L. LEE, S. LAKE, and S.-B. WOO
Using the modified Schirmer test to measure mouth dryness: A preliminary study
J Am Dent Assoc, February 1, 2005; 136(2): 164 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
J. Sanchez-Guerrero, M. R. Perez-Dosal, F. Cardenas-Velazquez, A. Perez-Reguera, E. Celis-Aguilar, A. E. Soto-Rojas, and C. Avila-Casado
Prevalence of Sjogren's syndrome in ambulatory patients according to the American-European Consensus Group criteria
Rheumatology, February 1, 2005; 44(2): 235 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.