Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pascual, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pascual, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sjogren's Syndrome
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2002; 41: 670-675
© 2002 British Society for Rheumatology


Original Papers

Usefulness of basal and pilocarpine-stimulated salivary flow in primary Sjögren's syndrome. Correlation with clinical, immunological and histological features

J. Rosas, M. Ramos-Casals4, J. Ena1, M. García-Carrasco4, J. Verdu3, R. Cervera4, J. Font4, O. Caballero3, M. Ingelmo4 and E. Pascual2

Rheumatology and
1 Internal Medicine Units, Hospital of Vila-Joiosa, Alicante,
2 Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital of Alicante,
3 Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital of San Juan, Alicante and
4 Systemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Objectives. To examine salivary function in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) by assessing unstimulated and stimulated flows using 5 mg of pilocarpine in a 5% solution, in order to define their clinical usefulness in the evaluation of xerostomia in patients with primary SS as well as to identify those factors related to the increase in salivary flow after pilocarpine stimulation.

Methods. We investigated the clinical and immunological characteristics of 60 consecutive patients with primary SS. All patients fulfilled four or more of the preliminary diagnostic European criteria for SS. We measured unstimulated (basal) salivary flow (BSF) in all patients. In patients with BSF <=1.5 ml, stimulated salivary flows (SSF) were also measured after stimulation with an ophthalmic 5% pilocarpine solution (0.1 ml=5 mg, administered sublingually). SSF was also measured after oral administration of 50 mg anetholetrithione (ANTT) in the same patients. These stimulated salivary flows were measured 1, 2 and 3 h after the stimulus.

Results. Of the 60 patients, 55 were women and five men, with a mean age at the SS onset of 61 yr (range 18–82 yr). The mean BSF for SS patients was 1.40±0.17 ml. Fifty (83%) patients showed a BSF less than 1.5 ml. The stimulated salivary flow after 1 h was 3.23 ml in the pilocarpine group and 0.57 in the ANTT group (P<0.001); after 2 h it was 1.32 ml in the pilocarpine group and 0.52 in the ANTT group (P=0.02) and after 3 h it was 0.80 ml in the pilocarpine group and 0.41 in the ANTT group (P=0.046). No clinical or immunological differences were found between SS patients with BSF more or less than 1.5 ml, although patients with a BSF less than 1.5 ml showed a parotid scintigraphy class III or IV more frequently (42 vs 0%, P=0.01). SS patients with a pilocarpine SSF less than 1.5 ml had a longer duration of SS (73.3 vs 31.3 months, P=0.03) and a higher prevalence of positive anti-Ro/SS-A (70 vs 36%, P=0.038), anti-La/SS-B (65 vs 32%, P=0.038), parotid scintigraphy class III–IV (79 vs 9%, P<0.001) and positive salivary gland biopsy (90 vs 43%, P<0.001).

Conclusion. The study of xerostomia using basal and pilocarpine SSF is simple to perform, acceptable to patients and needs no special equipment. We describe a significant increase in SSF using a solution of 5% pilocarpine in comparison with salivary flow obtained after stimulation with ANTT. Twenty-two of the 46 patients with low BSF had stimulated flows over 1.5 ml. These ‘responder’ patients showed a shorter duration of sicca symptoms, a lower frequency of positive immunological markers and milder grades of scintigraphic patterns and lymphocytic infiltrates in salivary gland biopsies. This subset of patients probably maintain a residual capacity of their salivary glands, as opposed to the ‘non-responder’ patients, who had a longer duration of sicca syndrome evolution with more severe involvement of the salivary glands.

KEY WORDS: Sjögren's syndrome, Xerostomia, Pilocarpine.

Correspondence to: J. Rosas, Hospital Marina Baixa, Unidad de Reumatología, Partida Galandú, no. 5, 03570 La Vila-Joiosa, Alicante, Spain.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. S. Kassan and H. M. Moutsopoulos
Clinical Manifestations and Early Diagnosis of Sjogren Syndrome
Arch Intern Med, June 28, 2004; 164(12): 1275 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.