Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katsifis, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ioannidis, J. P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katsifis, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ioannidis, J. P. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Autoimmunity
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2002; 41: 780-786
© 2002 British Society for Rheumatology

Original Papers

Risk of myelotoxicity with intravenous cyclophosphamide in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

G. E. Katsifis, A. G. Tzioufas, P. G. Vlachoyiannopoulos, M. Voulgarelis, H. M. Moutsopoulos and J. P. A. Ioannidis1,

Department of Pathophysiology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece and
1 Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology Unit and Clinical Trials and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece and Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, USA

Objectives. To determine the incidence of serious myelotoxicity from intravenous cyclophosphamide (IC) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods. In a retrospective study, white blood cell (WBC) counts with differential and platelet counts were determined in 92 SLE patients (96 courses) given 1623 doses of IC.

Results. Only one patient developed a total leucocyte count <1000/mm3, one developed a neutrophil count <500/mm3, two had a lymphocyte count <100/mm3 and no patients had platelet counts <50000/mm3 during follow-up. The risk of a neutrophil count <500/mm3 was 0.06 per 100 visits [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00–0.34]. Two patients discontinued IC due to neutropenia [rate of 0.12 per 100 doses (95% CI 0.01–0.44)]. No clinical consequences were recorded in conjunction with low blood cell counts. In multivariate models, both the cumulative number of IC doses and European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM) score affected neutrophil and lymphocyte counts adversely. For neutrophils, lowering the ECLAM score by 1 point counteracted four additional doses of IC after adjusting for steroid dose.

Conclusions. IC and SLE disease activity have independent effects in lowering white blood cell counts, but serious myelotoxicity of IC is uncommon.

KEY WORDS: Myelotoxicity, Cyclophosphamide, Systemic lupus erythematosus, Blood cell count, Neutropenia.

Correspondence to: J. P. A. Ioannidis, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina 45110, Greece.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 LupusHome page
G E Katsifis and A G Tzioufas
Ovarian failure in systemic lupus erythematosus patients treated with pulsed intravenous cyclophosphamide
Lupus, September 1, 2004; 13(9): 673 - 678.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
P. P. Kapitsinou, J. N. Boletis, F. N. Skopouli, K. A. Boki, and H. M. Moutsopoulos
Lupus nephritis: treatment with mycophenolate mofetil
Rheumatology, March 1, 2004; 43(3): 377 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Rheum DisHome page
C P Mavragani and H M Moutsopoulos
Lupus nephritis: current issues
Ann Rheum Dis, September 1, 2003; 62(9): 795 - 798.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.