Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodstone, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hardingham, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodstone, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hardingham, T. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2002; 41: 883-891
© 2002 British Society for Rheumatology


Original Papers

Tumour necrosis factor {alpha} stimulates nitric oxide production more potently than interleukin-1ß in porcine articular chondrocytes

N. J. Goodstone and T. E. Hardingham

The Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Matrix Research, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M139PT, UK

Objective. To compare the time- and concentration-dependent effects of tumour necrosis factor {alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) and interleukin 1ß (IL-1ß) on the induction of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), the production of nitric oxide (NO) and the expression of aggrecan and hyaluronan (HA) in chondrocytes.

Methods. Primary porcine articular chondrocytes were treated with recombinant human (rh) TNF-{alpha} or rhIL-1ß for up to 72 h. Culture supernatants were assayed for NO production. Synthesis of HA and aggrecan was determined by radiolabelling cultures with [3H]glucosamine and/or [35S]sulphate. Total RNA was isolated and the time courses of changes in gene expression of inducible NOS and HA synthase-2 were investigated by reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction.

Results. rhTNF-{alpha} stimulated more NO production than rhIL-1ß. It was also active at lower concentrations; rhTNF-{alpha} at 0.006 pM (100 pg/ml) was equivalent to rhIL-1ß at 0.29 pM (5000 pg/ml). The time course of induction was transient and slower at low concentrations. Contrary to previous reports, rhTNF-{alpha} and rhIL-1ß were of similar potency in the inhibition of aggrecan synthesis. In contrast, both cytokines stimulated HA synthesis, and this was correlated with the transient induction of HA synthase-2. An inhibitor of inducible NOS relieved the inhibition of aggrecan synthesis caused by both cytokines at low concentrations, but it showed little effect on HA synthesis.

Conclusion. At low concentrations, rhTNF-{alpha} was 50 times more potent than rhIL-1ß in stimulating NO production by chondrocytes and it was of similar potency in inhibiting aggrecan synthesis and in stimulating HA synthesis. Inhibition of inducible NOS activity relieved some of the effects on aggrecan synthesis, showing that part of the action of TNF-{alpha} is mediated through NO. HA synthesis was not affected.

Correspondence to: N. J. Goodstone, The Arthritis Research Centre, The Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire SY107AG, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G.-X. Zhang, B. Gran, S. Yu, J. Li, I. Siglienti, X. Chen, M. Kamoun, and A. Rostami
Induction of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis in IL-12 Receptor-{beta}2-Deficient Mice: IL-12 Responsiveness Is Not Required in the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Demyelination in the Central Nervous System
J. Immunol., February 15, 2003; 170(4): 2153 - 2160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.