Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferraccioli, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Di Poi, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferraccioli, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Di Poi, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Right arrow Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Autoimmunity
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2002; 41: 892-898
© 2002 British Society for Rheumatology


Original Papers

Analysis of improvements, full responses, remission and toxicity in rheumatoid patients treated with step-up combination therapy (methotrexate, cyclosporin A, sulphasalazine) or monotherapy for three years

G. F. Ferraccioli, E. Gremese, P. Tomietto, G. Favret, R. Damato and E. Di Poi

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, DPMSC, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy

Objective. To evaluate two monotherapies followed by step-up combination therapy with two or three complementary drugs in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in comparison with sulphasalazine (SSZ) alone.

Methods. One hundred and twenty-six consecutive patients with early active RA were enrolled in this open controlled clinical trial. The primary end-point was 50% improvement according to the ACR criteria (ACR50) at 6, 12 or 18 months. The secondary end-points were a full response (Magnusson criteria) and/or remission (ACR criteria) at 3 yr. Methotrexate (MTX) (group 1), cyclosporin A (CsA) (group 2) or SSZ (group 3) was used first. After 6 months, a combination of two drugs (CsA and MTX) was employed in groups 1 and 2. SSZ was added after 12 months if improvement was less than ACR50 with the combination. Group 3 continued with SSZ alone.

Results. After 6 months, 57% of patients in group 1, 31% of group 2 (MTX vs CsA, P=0.002) and 33% of group 3 (MTX vs SSZ, P=0.01) had reached ACR50 improvement according to intention-to-treat analysis. At month 12 after starting a drug combination, 67% of group 1 and 76% of group 2 had reached ACR50 compared with 24% of group 3. At the 18-month follow-up, 90% of group 1 and 88% of group 2 but only 24% of group 3 had reached ACR50. After 18 months, 62% of group 1, 60% of group 2 and 48% of group 3 showed side-effects and three, five and eight patients in the three groups respectively had dropped out of the study. At the 3-yr follow-up, 9% of the patients in groups 1 and 2 and 7% of group 3 were in remission according to the ACR criteria; according to the Magnusson criteria, 40% showed a full response in groups 1 and 2 but only 21% did so in group 3.

Conclusion. MTX appears to be the fastest-acting agent. A step-up approach with MTX plus CsA plus SSZ led to a 50% improvement according to the ACR criteria in most patients. After 3 yr, 40% of patients receiving combination therapy and 21% of patients receiving monotherapy showed a full response, while 9 and 7% respectively attained remission.

KEY WORDS: Combination therapy, Monotherapy, Methotrexate, Cyclosporin A, Sulphasalazine.

This work was presented in abstract form at the 1997 ACR meeting (abstract no. 1129).

Correspondence to: G. F. Ferraccioli.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.