Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacGowan, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Isenberg, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacGowan, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Isenberg, D. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Autoimmunity
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2002; 41: 981-987
© 2002 British Society for Rheumatology


Original papers

Retrospective analysis of outcome in a cohort of patients with lupus nephritis treated between 1977 and 1999

J. R. MacGowan, S. Ellis, M. Griffiths1 and D. A. Isenberg

The Centre for Rheumatology, Middlesex Hospital, Arthur Stanley House, 40–50 Tottenham Street, London, W1P 9PG and
1 The Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, University Street, London W1N 8AA, UK

Objective. To review the development, histological type and outcome of a cohort of patients with lupus nephritis who were managed and followed up by the specialist Bloomsbury Rheumatology Unit between 1977 and 1999.

Patients and methods. Seventy-eight of the 280 (28%) patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) developed nephritis. Occurrence of end stage renal disease (ESRD) according to World Health Organization (WHO) class was analysed, and patients were subdivided according to whether treatment included at least six pulses of intravenous (i.v.) cyclophosphamide (CYC) once a month.

Results. For patients with WHO class III nephritis, three out of five treated with i.v. CYC developed ESRD compared with none out of 10 not treated with i.v. CYC (P < 0.02). There was no significant difference between these subgroups in terms of a variety of parameters with good prognostic value, except anti-dsDNA titre at time of biopsy (which was greater in the former). For patients with WHO class IV nephritis, three out of 16 treated with i.v. CYC developed ESRD, compared with five out of 20 not treated with i.v. CYC (no significant difference).

Conclusion. These data suggest that there may be a subgroup of patients with lupus nephritis (WHO class III) whose long-term outcome is not adversely affected by the omission of i.v. CYC.

KEY WORDS: Lupus nephritis, Cyclophosphamide, WHO class.

Correspondence to: D. A. Isenberg, The Centre for Rheumatology, Middlesex Hospital, Arthur Stanley House, 40–50 Tottenham Street, London WIP 9PG, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. A. Isenberg, J. J. Manson, M. R. Ehrenstein, and A. Rahman
Fifty years of anti-ds DNA antibodies: are we approaching journey's end?
Rheumatology, July 1, 2007; 46(7): 1052 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
H. M. Bastian, G. S. Alarcon, J. M. Roseman, G. McGwin Jr, L. M. Vila, B. J. Fessler, J. D. Reveille, and for the LUMINA study group
Systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic US cohort (LUMINA) XL II: factors predictive of new or worsening proteinuria
Rheumatology, April 1, 2007; 46(4): 683 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
M. Adler, S. Chambers, C. Edwards, G. Neild, and D. Isenberg
An assessment of renal failure in an SLE cohort with special reference to ethnicity, over a 25-year period
Rheumatology, September 1, 2006; 45(9): 1144 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.