Rheumatology 2003; 42: 6-13
© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology
The effect of treatment on radiological progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials
Menzies Centre for Population Health Research, GPO Box 252-23, Hobart, Tasmania 7000,
1 Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care and
2 Department of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia
Objective. To undertake a systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials to assess and rank the efficacy of pharmacological interventions in preventing radiological progression of rheumatoid arthritis.
Methods. The two outcome measures were the weighted standardized mean difference and the odds of progression of X-ray scores pooled as close to 12 months as possible to minimize heterogeneity.
Results. A total of 38 trials were identified. Of these, 13 were excluded, leaving data on 3907 subjects. Infliximab, cyclosporin, sulphasalazine, leflunomide, methotrexate, parenteral gold, corticosteroids, auranofin and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist were statistically better than placebo in terms of change in erosion scores. All agents were equivalent statistically, with the exception of infliximab (which was superior to the last five agents). There were similar findings for the odds of progression, with the exception of auranofin (P=0.06) and the infliximabmethotrexate comparison (P=0.07). Other agents did not reach statistical significance in either outcome measure. With the exception of the antimalarials, the magnitude of the effect was consistent with the effect seen in short-term disease activity trials.
Conclusion. There is published evidence which supports the efficacy of nine agents in decreasing radiological progression in rheumatoid arthritis.
KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Meta-analysis, Therapy, Radiographic, Trial, Placebo.
Correspondence to: G. Jones. E-mail: g.jones{at}utas.edu.au
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-M. Wong, Y. Ko, and A. Chan Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions Between Oral Anticancer Agents and Nonanticancer Agents: Profiling and Comparison of Two Drug Compendia Ann. Pharmacother., December 1, 2008; 42(12): 1737 - 1748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M van der Kooij, J. K de Vries-Bouwstra, Y. P M Goekoop-Ruiterman, D. van Zeben, P. J S M Kerstens, A. H Gerards, J. H L M van Groenendael, J. M W Hazes, F. C Breedveld, C. F Allaart, et al. Limited efficacy of conventional DMARDs after initial methotrexate failure in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis treated according to the disease activity score Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2007; 66(10): 1356 - 1362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M E Weinblatt Rheumatoid arthritis in 2003: where are we now with treatment? Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2003; 62(90002): ii94 - 96. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
ADDITIONAL ARTICLES ABSTRACTED IN ACP JOURNAL CLUB Evid. Based Med., September 1, 2003; 8(5): 131 - 131. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (24 Jan 03 to 18 Apr 03) Evid. Based Nurs., July 1, 2003; 6(3): e1 - 12. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



