Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on June 16, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/10/1216    most recent
keg360v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haahr, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haahr, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, J. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soft Tissue Rheumatism
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2003; 42: 1216-1225
© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology

Prognostic factors in lateral epicondylitis: a randomized trial with one-year follow-up in 266 new cases treated with minimal occupational intervention or the usual approach in general practice

J. P. Haahr and J. H. Andersen

Department of Occupational Medicine, Herning Hospital, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark.

Correspondence to: J. P. Haahr. E-mail: hecjph{at}ringamt.dk

Objectives. To determine whether minimal intervention by occupational specialists involving information about the disorder, encouragement to stay active and instruction in graded self-performed exercises could enhance the prognosis of lateral epicondylitis compared with the treatment usually given in general practice, to quantify workplace factors associated with the prognosis, and to consider treatments given in general practice.

Methods. A randomized controlled trial was performed in a cohort of 266 consecutive new cases of lateral epicondylitis diagnosed in general practice. Workplace factors were assessed with questionnaires at the time of inclusion, and patients completed follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months. Status at 1 yr was assessed as overall improvement and pain reduction compared with the time of diagnosis. General practitioners (GPs) registered the treatments given for both cases and controls during follow-up. Numbers of contacts with GPs and physiotherapists were obtained from the National Health Insurance registry. Prognostic factors were analysed by multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results. After 1 yr, 83% of cases showed improvement in the condition, but the intervention was found to have had no advantage. Poor overall improvement was associated with employment in manual jobs [odds ratio (OR) 3.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0–8.7], a high level of physical strain at work (OR 8.5, CI 1.0–74.7) and a high level of pain at baseline (OR 2.3, CI 1.0–5.3). Pain reduction less than 50% was associated with manual jobs (OR 2.3, CI 1.1–5.1), high physical strain at work (OR 3.6, CI 1.0–12.9), high baseline distress (OR 1.9, CI 1.0–4.0) and tennis elbow on the dominant side (OR 3.1, CI 1.4–6.8). The intervention group received less treatment and fewer treatment modalities, but the intervention was not followed by a reduction in the number of visits to GPs and physiotherapist clinics during 12 months of follow-up.

Conclusions. Poor prognosis at 1 yr of follow-up for lateral epicondylitis was related to manual work and high baseline pain, whilst no relation was found between the type of medical treatment given/chosen and prognosis. This may have implications for the future management of lateral epicondylitis in terms of a greater focus on interaction with the workplace regarding job modification to reduce physical demands during recovery.

KEY WORDS: Tennis elbow, Workplace factors, Health-care utilization, Primary care, Prevention.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
R. P. Calfee, A. Patel, M. F. DaSilva, and E. Akelman
Management of Lateral Epicondylitis: Current Concepts
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2008; 16(1): 19 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
L. Bisset, N. Smidt, D. A. Van der Windt, L. M. Bouter, G. Jull, P. Brooks, and B. Vicenzino
Conservative treatments for tennis elbow do subgroups of patients respond differently?
Rheumatology, October 1, 2007; 46(10): 1601 - 1605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
J.-L. Croisier, M. Foidart-Dessalle, F. Tinant, J.-M. Crielaard, and B. Forthomme
An isokinetic eccentric programme for the management of chronic lateral epicondylar tendinopathy
Br. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2007; 41(4): 269 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
A. Feleus, S. M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra, H. S. Miedema, A. P. Verhagen, A. P. Nauta, A. Burdorf, J. A. N. Verhaar, and B. W. Koes
Prognostic indicators for non-recovery of non-traumatic complaints at arm, neck and shoulder in general practice--6 months follow-up
Rheumatology, January 1, 2007; 46(1): 169 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
D Stasinopoulos and M I Johnson
Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis)
Br. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2005; 39(3): 132 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.