Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on June 27, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/10/1247    most recent
keg355v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, E.
Right arrow Articles by Capell, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, E.
Right arrow Articles by Capell, H. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2003; 42: 1247-1250
© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology


Report

Attitude of rheumatoid arthritis patients to treatment with oral corticosteroids

E. Morrison, D. Crosbie and H. A. Capell1

Department of Rheumatology, Southern General Hospital and 1Centre for Rheumatic Disease, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.

Correspondence to: E. Morrison, Department of Rheumatology, Southern General Hospital, South Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK. E-mail: elaine.morrison{at}SGH.scot.nhs.uk

Objective. To assess the attitudes of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients to oral corticosteroid treatment, factors influencing these views and their likely clinical impact.

Methods. A cross-sectional survey of 158 consecutive RA out-patients was carried out at two centres over 2 weeks. Demography, disease duration, function [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), years of formal education and social deprivation index were noted. Prospective recruitment into the multicentre West of Scotland Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Corticosteroid Trial (WOSERACT) was monitored and reasons for refusal to participate (when available) were noted at three of the centres.

Results. Forty-eight (32%) patients were willing to be treated with oral corticosteroid and 100 (68%) were not. The former were older (P = 0.002), had a higher ESR (P = 0.007), poorer function (P = 0.001) and greater previous exposure to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (P = 0.013). Ninety patients refused to participate in WOSERACT, in 46 cases (40 female, 6 male) the reason being concerns about corticosteroids.

Conclusions. This study shows a high level of concern about and refusal of corticosteroid treatment in RA, due mainly to patient concerns about adverse effects. Rheumatologists need to be aware of these attitudes as they are likely to affect prescribing.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Corticosteroid treatment, Patient attitudes, Corticosteroid side-effects, Study recruitment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
L. Fardet, J. Cabane, A. Kettaneh, C. Lebbe, and A. Flahault
Corticosteroid-induced lipodystrophy is associated with features of the metabolic syndrome
Rheumatology, July 1, 2007; 46(7): 1102 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
E. Morrison and H. A. Capell
Corticosteroids in the management of early and established rheumatoid disease
Rheumatology, September 1, 2006; 45(9): 1058 - 1061.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
R. Neame and A. Hammond
Beliefs about medications: a questionnaire survey of people with rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology, June 1, 2005; 44(6): 762 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.