Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on June 16, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/11/1332    most recent
keg376v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Layton, D.
Right arrow Articles by Shakir, S. A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Layton, D.
Right arrow Articles by Shakir, S. A. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2003; 42: 1332-1341
© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology

Comparison of the incidence rates of selected gastrointestinal events reported for patients prescribed celecoxib and meloxicam in general practice in England using prescription-event monitoring (PEM) data

D. Layton1,2, K. Hughes1, S. Harris1,3 and S. A. W. Shakir1,2

1Drug Safety Research Unit, Bursledon Hall, Blundell Lane, Southampton, 2University of Portsmouth and 3University of Southampton, UK.

Correspondence to: D. Layton. E-mail: deborah.layton{at}dsru.org

Background. Celecoxib and meloxicam are classified as cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitors, and were developed to minimize the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity commonly associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The Drug Safety Research Unit (DSRU) monitored the safety of these drugs immediately after launch in England using the non-interventional observational cohort technique of prescription-event monitoring (PEM). Our objective was to investigate whether there is a clinically relevant difference in incidence of reported symptomatic (acid/peptic) and complicated upper GI conditions (perforations/bleeding) between celecoxib and meloxicam during use in general practice.

Methods. Patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions written by general practitioners (GPs) for meloxicam (December 1996 to March 1997) and celecoxib (May to December 2000). Simple questionnaires requesting details of events occurring during/after treatment and potential risk factors (including age, sex, history of upper GI problems, and NSAIDS prescribed within 3 months of treatment) were posted to prescribing GPs at least 6 months after the first prescription for each patient. Incidence rates of the first event were calculated; crude and adjusted rate ratios (RR) obtained using regression modelling.

Results. For celecoxib and meloxicam, respectively, 1054 (6.0%) and 1376 (7.2%) patients had symptomatic (acid/peptic) upper GI events whereas 42 (0.2%) and 67 (0.4%) had complicated upper GI conditions (perforations/bleeding). A higher proportion of the celecoxib cohort had an indication for osteoarthritis (28.1 vs 23.2%), were female (68.3 vs 67.1%), were aged 60 yr or more (59.5 vs 55.0%), were prescribed NSAIDs within 3 months of starting treatment (49.4 vs 47.9%), and had a past medical history of upper GI conditions (54.7 vs 29.2%) than those prescribed meloxicam. This suggests differential channelling of groups at higher risk of such events on to celecoxib compared with meloxicam. There was no difference between the two drugs in the time to occurrence of either group of event. The RR over the 270-day study period for celecoxib compared with meloxicam were 0.77 (95% CI 0.69, 0.85) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.32, 0.96) for symptomatic (acid/peptic) upper GI events and complicated upper GI conditions (perforations/bleeding), respectively, adjusted for age, age2, sex, indication, medical history of upper GI problems and whether NSAIDs were prescribed within 3 months prior to starting treatment.

Conclusions. This study reports a relative reduction (23%) in the incidence of symptomatic (acid/peptic) GI events, and a relative reduction (44%) in the incidence rate of complicated upper GI conditions (perforations/bleeding) for celecoxib compared with meloxicam.

KEY WORDS: COX-2 selective inhibitors, Celecoxib, Meloxicam, Adverse events, Prescription-event monitoring, Drug safety.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
F. Degner, E. Lesaffre, and H. Zeidler
Re: Layton et al. Comparison of the incidence rates of selected gastrointestinal events reported for patients prescribed rofecoxib and meloxicam in general practice in England using prescription-event monitoring data
Rheumatology, May 1, 2004; 43(5): 680 - 681.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. Layton, S. Harris, and S. Shakir
Reply: Re: Layton et al. Comparison of the incidence rates of selected gastrointestinal events reported for patients prescribed rofecoxib and meloxicam in general practice in England using prescription-event monitoring data
Rheumatology, May 1, 2004; 43(5): 681 - 682.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.