Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on July 16, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/11/1354    most recent
keg401v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Layton, D.
Right arrow Articles by Shakir, S. A.W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Layton, D.
Right arrow Articles by Shakir, S. A.W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2003; 42: 1354-1364
© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology

Comparison of the incidence rates of thromboembolic events reported for patients prescribed celecoxib and meloxicam in general practice in England using Prescription-Event Monitoring (PEM) data

Deborah Layton1,2, Kerry Hughes1, Scott Harris1,3 and Saad A.W. Shakir1,2

1Drug Safety Research Unit, Bursledon Hall, Blundell Lane, Southampton, 2University of Portsmouth and 3University of Southampton, UK.

Correspondence to: D. Layton, Drug Safety Research Unit, Southampton SO31 1AA, UK. E-mail: deborah.layton{at}dsru.org

Background. Celecoxib and meloxicam are classified as cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitors. The Drug Safety Research Unit monitored the post marketing safety of these drugs in England using the non-interventional observational cohort technique of Prescription-Event Monitoring (PEM).

Objectives. To compare the incidence rates of selected thromboembolic (TE) (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and peripheral venous thrombotic) events reported for patients prescribed celecoxib and meloxicam in general practice.

Methods. Patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions written by general practitioners (GPs) for meloxicam (December 1996–March 1997) and celecoxib (May and December 2000). Simple questionnaires requesting details of events occurring during/after treatment, indication and potential risk factors (including age, sex and whether NSAIDs had been prescribed within 3 months of treatment) were posted to prescribing GPs at least 6 months after the first prescription for each patient. Incidence rates of the first event were calculated; crude and adjusted rate ratios (RRs) were obtained using Poisson regression modelling.

Results. During the 9 months after starting treatment, 28 (0.16%) and 19 (0.10%) of patients were reported to have experienced cardiovascular TE events, 68 (0.39%) and 52 (0.27%) cerebrovascular TE events, and 17 (0.10%) and 20 (0.10%) experienced peripheral venous thrombotic events for celecoxib and meloxicam, respectively. Regarding time to first event, there was a persistent divergence between the two drugs from 30 days after the start of treatment for both the cardiovascular TE event group (log rank test P = 0.0153) and cerebrovascular TE event group (log rank test P = 0.0055). Indication and use of an NSAID within 3 months prior to starting treatment had no effect on the relative risk estimates of the event groups and was excluded in subsequent analyses. Adjusting for the two identified risk factors of age (age2) and sex, the cerebrovascular TE event group rate was higher for celecoxib than for meloxicam, RR 1.66 (95% CI 1.10–2.51), over the study period and no different for the cardiovascular TE event group, RR 1.72 (95% CI 0.87–3.40) or peripheral venous thrombotic group, RR 1.06 (95% CI 0.51–2.19).

Conclusions. This study reports a relative increase in the rate of cerebrovascular TE events in users of celecoxib compared to meloxicam. There was no difference in the rate of cardiovascular TE events or peripheral venous thrombotic events between users of these two drugs. The incidence of these three groups of events reported in each of these two drug cohorts was low (<0.5%), therefore the relevance of our findings need to be taken into consideration with other clinical and pharmacoepidemiological studies.

KEY WORDS: Adverse events, Celecoxib, COX-2 selective inhibitors, Drug safety, Meloxicam, Prescription-Event Monitoring.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
S. Chaiamnuay, J. J. Allison, and J. R. Curtis
Risks versus benefits of cyclooxygenase-2-selective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., October 1, 2006; 63(19): 1837 - 1851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
S C. Jones
Relative Thromboembolic Risks Associated with COX-2 Inhibitors
Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2005; 39(7): 1249 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
T. D. WARNER and J. A. MITCHELL
Cyclooxygenases: new forms, new inhibitors, and lessons from the clinic
FASEB J, May 1, 2004; 18(7): 790 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.