Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on February 28, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/4/507    most recent
keg129v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hazemeijer, I.
Right arrow Articles by Rasker, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hazemeijer, I.
Right arrow Articles by Rasker, J. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Fibromyalgia
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2003; 42: 507-515
© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology


Review

Fibromyalgia and the therapeutic domain. A philosophical study on the origins of fibromyalgia in a specific social setting

I. Hazemeijer and J. J. Rasker1,

Department of Military Forensic and Social Psychiatry, PO Box 3003, 3800 DA Amersfoort and
1 Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Medisch Spectrum Twente and Department of Communication Studies, Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Objectives. Fibromyalgia has always attracted controversy. Wolfe states that fibromyalgia will always exist regardless of the name given to the syndrome. Hadler describes fibromyalgia as a form of illness behaviour escalated by labelling. However, we believe that fibromyalgia, as other functional somatic syndromes, is not waiting below the surface until it becomes manifest by labelling.

Methods. We developed our hypothesis on the relationship between a specific social setting (called the therapeutic domain) and fibromyalgia using empirical philosophical arguments based on Foucault and Hacking. A therapeutic domain is a real and heterogeneous medical domain in which people, their thoughts and practices, and medical technology in any form coexist and communicate. In this domain blood is aspirated, radiographs are taken and classification criteria are made and applied. It is a domain where patient and therapist have initiated a relationship, which is influenced by the media and political pressure. This results in a looping effect where classification criteria and images give structure to perceptions and form the description for human behaviour; the person thus diagnosed (!) constantly has to grow into the conformity of these classification criteria, which also have to be constantly revised. The fibromyalgia concept becomes manifest in an individual as non-specific aches and pains along with other features.

Results. In other times and settings this resulted in analogue syndromes like railway spine, telegraph wrists, neurocirculatory asthenia or perhaps repetitive strain injury. In the application of American College of Rheumatology fibromyalgia classification criteria, labels and medical technology it is possible that invisible experiences manifest themselves in a therapeutic domain. It is not only a phenotype induced by the physician, but in this domain a certain power creates reality making the ‘disease’ become manifest.

Conclusion. The only certainty in fibromyalgia is that it is still being diagnosed. For prevention and treatment of fibromyalgia, doctors as well as politicians and media have to start by fundamentally changing the therapeutic domain. In such a renewed setting, fibromyalgia cannot become manifest in an individual and thus fibromyalgia syndrome can no longer exist. A firm public message that symptoms can be psychological in origin to prevent their spread, as Wessely recently stated in the comparable case of mass psychogenic illness, is only a part of the answer.

KEY WORDS: Fibromyalgia, Functional somatic syndromes, Therapeutic domain, Doctor–patient relationship, Medical technology, Representation of diseases, Philosophy of fibromyalgia.

Correspondence to: J. J. Rasker, University of Twente, Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands. E-mail: j.j.rasker{at}wmw.utwente.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C. V. Caballero-Uribe
The fibromyalgia problem. A Latin American point of view
Rheumatology, October 1, 2004; 43(10): 1311 - 1313.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
I. Hazemeijer and J. J. Rasker
The fibromyalgia problem. A Latin American point of view: reply
Rheumatology, October 1, 2004; 43(10): 1313 - 1314.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
I. Hazemeijer and J. J. Rasker
Reply
Rheumatology, February 1, 2004; 43(2): 257 - 259.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
M. Harth and W. Nielson
Comment on 'Fibromyalgia and the therapeutic domain. A philosophical study on the origins of fibromyalgia in a specific social setting.' by Hazemeijer and Rasker
Rheumatology, February 1, 2004; 43(2): 257 - 257.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
F. Wolfe
From the outside of Plato's cave
Rheumatology, January 1, 2004; 43(1): 112 - 113.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
I. Hazemeijer and J. J. Rasker
Reply
Rheumatology, January 1, 2004; 43(1): 113 - 113.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
S L Mackie and A O Frank
Medically unexplained symptoms: (Letter 1 of 2)
J R Soc Med, August 1, 2003; 96(8): 422 - 422.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.