Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on April 16, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/8/995    most recent
keg281v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minnock, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bresnihan, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minnock, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bresnihan, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Psychology: Measurement and Management of Pain
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2003; 42: 995-1000
© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology

Women with established rheumatoid arthritis perceive pain as the predominant impairment of health status

P. Minnock1,, O. FitzGerald1,2,3 and B. Bresnihan1,2,3

1 Rheumatology Rehabilitation, Our Lady's Hospice, Dublin,
2 St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin and
3 Department of Rheumatology, University College Dublin, Ireland

Objective. The aim of this study was to characterize perceptions of health and well-being in women with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods. Women aged between 40 and 60 yr with RA for more than 3 yr, and who were receiving stable doses of anti-rheumatic drug therapy, were selected for study. The Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS2) was employed to quantify current health status impairments, the impairments that were attributed to RA, perceptions of current health status compared with other women of the same age, and perceptions of future health status.

Results. Fifty-eight patients were studied. The full range of 12 AIMS2 dimensions was used when quantifying impairments in health status. The dominant impairment was pain. Moreover, 88% of patients attributed current pain to RA. Fifty-two per cent perceived their health status to be fair, poor or very poor compared with other women of the same age. Twenty-five per cent expected poor future health status, compared with 10% who perceived poor current health status. Only one patient (2%) expected excellent future health status.

Conclusion. In this study, a large majority of women perceived impairments of health status that they attributed to RA. Pain was perceived as the predominant impairment. Deterioration in health status was anticipated by many. The inclusion of patient perceptions of health status and disease impact as outcome measures in both cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical research protocols merits further study.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Patients' perceptions, Pain, Women's health.

Correspondence to: P. Minnock, Rheumatology Rehabilitation, Our Lady's Hospice, Harold's Cross, Dublin 6, Ireland. E-mail: minnockp{at}eircom.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
P. Minnock, J. Kirwan, and B. Bresnihan
Fatigue is a reliable, sensitive and unique outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology, December 1, 2009; 48(12): 1533 - 1536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. Berry, A. Bradlow, and E. Bersellini
Perceptions of the risks and benefits of medicines in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other painful musculoskeletal conditions
Rheumatology, July 1, 2004; 43(7): 901 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.