Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on July 30, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
43/1/73    most recent
keg453v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawton, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tennant, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lawton, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tennant, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2004; 43: 73-78
© British Society for Rheumatology 2003; all rights reserved

Clinical

The Behçet's Disease Activity Index

G. Lawton, B. B. Bhakta, M. A. Chamberlain and A. Tennant

Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Correspondence to: B. B. Bhakta, Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Leeds, 36 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9NZ, UK. E-mail: b.bhakta{at}leeds.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective. To identify a subset of clinical features of Behçet's disease (BD) that can be summated to form an overall index of disease activity appropriate for clinical and research use internationally.

Methods. Completed Behçet's Disease Current Activity Forms were collected from a total of 524 patients with BD from five countries. The data from 14 questions on the form were subjected to Rasch analysis to establish whether these items form a hierarchical and unidimensional scale of disease activity, both within and between countries.

Results. The data showed a good fit to the Rasch model within three countries using a dichotomous scoring function. However, when the data from these three countries were pooled, the fit to the model was poor. Cross-cultural differential item functioning (DIF) was found in seven items in the pooled data. When the items with DIF by country were separated and two items were removed, the resulting 26-item scale showed a good fit to the Rasch model.

Conclusions. Within Turkey, Korea and the UK, the 14 items can be summated to give an index of disease activity. Analysis of the pooled data confirmed that the index is not suitable for comparison between countries or for pooling of data in the raw form, but after fitting the data to the Rasch model such comparisons can be made. This gives a scaling tool that is quick and easy to use in the clinical situation.

KEY WORDS: Behçet's disease, Disease activity, Rasch analysis, Cross-cultural validity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.