Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on June 22, 2004
Rheumatology 2004 43(9):1167-1172; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh278
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
43/9/1167    most recent
keh278v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hewlett, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hewlett, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health Economics
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology Vol. 43 No. 9 © British Society for Rheumatology 2004; all rights reserved


Paper

Welfare rights services for people disabled with arthritis integrated in primary care and hospital settings: set-up costs and monetary benefits

J. E. Powell, C. Langley1, J. Kirwan2, D. Gubbay3, D. Memel1,2, J. Pollock, R. Means and S. Hewlett2

University of the West of England, 1 Air Balloon Surgery, 2 University of Bristol and 3 Barton Hill Advice Service, Bristol, UK.

Correspondence to: J. Powell, Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of the West of England, Bristol, Glenside Campus, Blackberry Hill, Stapleton, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK. E-mail: Jane.Powell{at}uwe.ac.uk

Objective. To quantify the set-up costs and monetary benefits of a welfare rights service integrated within an NHS service provider, that selects eligible patients using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and offers welfare rights advice to assist in application for Disability Living Allowance and Attendance Allowance.

Method. (1) Design: a cost evaluation of a social intervention, screening with the HAQ and welfare rights advice in primary care and hospital settings. (2) Setting: Eight general practices and four hospital rheumatology out-patient departments were selected from four localities in the southwest of England. (3) Participants: Two hundred and sixty-eight eligible patients with arthritis accepted an interview with a welfare rights officer (WRO) from a sample of 1989 service users identified from GPs’ records and hospital out-patient lists. Two hundred and forty two service users expressed an interest in take up of the social intervention. (4) Service users with a HAQ score ≥1.5 were contacted by telephone and offered an appointment with an experienced WRO to help them complete a welfare benefit application form. A ‘micro-costing’ study was undertaken with assessment of monetary benefits received.

Results. The indicative set-up costs of similar welfare rights services are £8125 in a GP setting and £9307 per annum in a hospital setting at 2002 prices. Total annual unclaimed Disability Living Allowance/Attendance Allowance granted to successful claimants was £184,382 in the GP setting (n = 84 from 137) and £169,309 in the hospital setting (n = 79 from 131).

Conclusions. Welfare rights advice received during a visit to a GP practice or a hospital out-patient department can substantially reduce the level of unclaimed benefit in arthritic populations including the elderly; with mobility and care difficulties. A welfare rights service integrated within a GP practice or hospital that screens people with arthritis using HAQ scores and encourages those with scores ≥1.5 to see a WRO for help with welfare benefit confers monetary benefits for service users that substantially outweigh set-up costs.

KEY WORDS: Modernisation, Cost, Arthritis, Monetary benefits, Social intervention


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
E. Pascual and F. Sivera
Why is gout so poorly managed?
Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2007; 66(10): 1269 - 1270.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.