Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on August 16, 2005
Rheumatology 2005 44(10):1277-1281; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh713
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
44/10/1277    most recent
keh713v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barkham, N.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barkham, N.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Spondylarthropathies
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

The unmet need for anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in ankylosing spondylitis

N. Barkham, K. O. Kong, A. Tennant1, A. Fraser, E. Hensor, A. M. Keenan and P. Emery

Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, Department of Rheumatology, First Floor, The General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX and 1 Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, Department of Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, 36 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9NZ, UK.

Correspondence to: P. Emery, arc Professor of Rheumatology, Clinical Director—Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, Department of Rheumatology, 1st Floor, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. E-mail: p.emery{at}leeds.ac.uk

Objectives. Anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy is effective in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), but guidelines are needed because of the cost. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the proportion of patients with AS who meet the criteria for anti-TNF therapy as well as to explore the relationship between disease activity, health status and quality of life in patients with AS who would potentially meet the criteria compared with those who would not.

Methods. All patients with a confirmed diagnosis of AS were identified via a search through the clinic correspondence database and sent postal questionnaires. Data captured included demographics, disease activity, aspects of functional impairment, activity limitation and quality of life using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), pain scores (using a visual analogue scale), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), short-form 36 (SF-36) and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) questionnaire. The unpaired Student's t-test, {chi}2 test and Mann–Whitney U-test were performed for comparisons of groups where appropriate.

Results. Out of 325 mailed questionnaires, 246 (76%) were returned. The mean age of the patients who replied to the questionnaire was 52 yr (±12 yr) and 25% (62) were females. Mean BASDAI was 49 (±24) and 64% had a BASDAI ≥ 40. There were significant differences between the groups with a BASDAI above and below 40 in pain by VAS, functional ability (BASFI, HAQ), health status (SF-36) and quality of life (ASQoL). Almost two-thirds (64%) of patients would meet the criteria for anti-TNF therapy under recommended guidelines.

Conclusion. Patients with AS demonstrated poor functional status and poor quality of life. There is a large unmet need for effective therapy in AS, with almost two-thirds of patients meeting the proposed criteria for biological therapy. Patients with a BASDAI ≥ 40 had a worse functional status and quality of life than those who have a BASDAI of <40. These results indicate that the need for effective intervention for AS is a priority area.

KEY WORDS: Ankylosing spondylitis, Anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy, Disease activity, Functional status, Quality of life


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
J. Braun and J. Sieper
What is the most important outcome parameter in ankylosing spondylitis?
Rheumatology, December 1, 2008; 47(12): 1738 - 1740.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
R. M. Ara, A. V. Reynolds, and P. Conway
The cost-effectiveness of etanercept in patients with severe ankylosing spondylitis in the UK
Rheumatology, August 1, 2007; 46(8): 1338 - 1344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
R. N. Jois, K. Gaffney, and A. Keat
Anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy for ankylosing spondylitis--unresolved issues
Rheumatology, June 1, 2007; 46(6): 899 - 901.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
J. Braun, N. McHugh, A. Singh, J. S. Wajdula, and R. Sato
Improvement in patient-reported outcomes for patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with etanercept 50 mg once-weekly and 25 mg twice-weekly
Rheumatology, June 1, 2007; 46(6): 999 - 1004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
M M Ward
Outcomes in ankylosing spondylitis: what makes the assessment of treatment effects in ankylosing spondylitis different?
Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2006; 65(suppl_3): iii25 - iii28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.