Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on July 19, 2005
Rheumatology 2005 44(11):1394-1398; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kei024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
44/11/1394    most recent
kei024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The changing use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis from the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database

C. J. Edwards1,2, N. K. Arden1,2, D. Fisher1, J. C. Saperia1, I. Reading1, T. P. Van Staa1,3 and C. Cooper1,2

1 MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, University of Southampton, 2 Department of Rheumatology, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK and 3 Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to: C. J. Edwards, Department of Rheumatology, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. E-mail: cedwards{at}soton.ac.uk

Objectives. To describe the use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and changing trends in their use.

Methods. We used the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) to describe DMARD use by patients with RA identified using ICD-9 codes. The GPRD is a UK national database containing records of more than 7 million individuals from 683 general practices. Subjects were studied between 1987 and 2002. The prevalence and duration of individual DMARD use and changing trends in DMARD use were investigated.

Results. Thirty-four thousand three hundred and sixty-four patients with RA were identified. Only 17 115 (50%) individuals were prescribed at least one DMARD during the study period. The most commonly prescribed DMARD over the study period was sulphasalazine (46.3%) and then methotrexate (31.4%). Use of methotrexate has increased 17-fold (1.8% of all DMARD prescriptions in 1988 to 30% in 2002) whereas use of gold has fallen (13.2% to 2.3%). Analysis of DMARD persistence using Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed the methotrexate use persisted significantly longer than other DMARDs with an estimated median of 8.1 yr. Prednisolone was used in up to 50% of RA patients in any one year and has remained fairly constant throughout the study period.

Conclusions. Large numbers of individuals with a clinical diagnosis of RA identified from a large primary care database are not receiving DMARDs. This work suggests that many individuals with RA have not been treated appropriately and this may have major long-term consequences on joint damage and general health.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, DMARDs, General Practice Research Database


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C. G. Grijalva, C. P. Chung, C. M. Stein, E. F. Mitchel Jr, and M. R. Griffin
Changing patterns of medication use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a Medicaid population
Rheumatology, July 1, 2008; 47(7): 1061 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
E. L. Williams and C. J. Edwards
Patient preferences in choosing anti-TNF therapies-R1
Rheumatology, December 1, 2006; 45(12): 1575 - 1576.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.