Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on March 1, 2005
Rheumatology 2005 44(6):777-780; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh592
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
44/6/777    most recent
keh592v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simonini, G.
Right arrow Articles by Falcini, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simonini, G.
Right arrow Articles by Falcini, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Bone status over 1 yr of etanercept treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

G. Simonini, T. Giani, S. Stagi1, M. de Martino1 and F. Falcini

Department of Pediatrics-Rheumatology Unit and 1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Florence, Italy.

Correspondence to: G. Simonini, Department of Pediatrics-Rheumatology Unit, Via Pico della Mirandola 24, 50132 Firenze, Italy. E-mail: gabriele.simonini{at}unifi.it

Objective. To evaluate bone mineral status over 1 yr of etanercept treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

Methods. Twenty children (13 female, 7 male) aged 5.2–11.4 yr, with active polyarticular JIA were prospectively enrolled to receive etanercept (0.4 mg/kg, twice weekly). Responders were defined according to the American College of Rheumatology Pediatric 50 definition of improvement. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) by bone was determined at the left calcaneus to assess bone status at baseline and at 1-yr follow-up.

Results. After 12 months of treatment, 15 (75%) patients were considered as responders. At baseline, responders and non-responders did not differ with regard to age, disease duration, core-set variables or BUA and Z-score values (patient's value – age specific normal value/normal group's S.D.). At 6-month and 1-yr follow-up in the whole group, BUA and Z-score values were not significantly different compared with baseline. At 1-yr follow-up, but not at 6 months, all 15 responders, differently from non-responders, showed a significant increase in both BUA and Z-score values: BUA at 1 yr 55.2 ± 3.3 vs baseline 43.5 ± 3.2 dB/MHz, P<0.001; Z score at 1 yr –0.3 ± 0.2 vs baseline 1.5 ± 0.4, P<0.002.

Conclusion. For the first time in childhood rheumatic disease this pilot prospective study, although in a small group, shows evidence that 1 yr of etanercept therapy by controlling the underlying disease activity induces a sustained benefit on JIA bone loss. Prospective studies in larger patient samples are needed to confirm these data.

KEY WORDS: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Etanercept, Bone mineral status


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LupusHome page
V. Lilleby
Review: Bone status in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus, August 1, 2007; 16(8): 580 - 586.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
F. Galluzzi, S. Stagi, R. Salti, S. Toni, E. Piscitelli, G. Simonini, F. Falcini, and F. Chiarelli
Osteoprotegerin serum levels in children with type 1 diabetes: a potential modulating role in bone status
Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2005; 153(6): 879 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.