Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on May 3, 2005
Rheumatology 2005 44(8):1032-1037; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh674
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
44/8/1032    most recent
keh674v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woolhead, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dieppe, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woolhead, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dieppe, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Outcomes of total knee replacement: a qualitative study

G. M. Woolhead, J. L. Donovan and P. A. Dieppe1

Department of Social Medicine and 1 Medical Research Council Health Services Research Collaboration, Canynge Hall, University of Bristol, UK.

Correspondence to: G. M. Woolhead, Department of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK. E-mail: Gillian.Woolhead{at}bristol.ac.uk

Objective. To investigate patients' experiences of outcome from a total knee replacement (TKR).

Methods. In-depth interviews were conducted with 25 patients 3 months before TKR, with 10 interviewed again 6 months after surgery. Patients were purposively sampled to include a range of demographic characteristics. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. Methods of constant comparison were used to analyse the data.

Results. Individuals struggled to make sense of their outcome and often described it in contradictory terms. When asked directly, most reported a good outcome, but further discussion revealed concern and discomfort with continuing pain and mobility difficulties. These apparently contradictory accounts were consistent with the presentation of public and private views, were dependent on the context of patients’ lives, and represented an adaptation to their changed health state.

Conclusion. Individuals reported their outcome from TKR as good despite the continued experience of pain and immobility. Although TKR has been shown to be a highly effective procedure using quantitative methods, they may need to be qualified by these qualitative findings.

KEY WORDS: Osteoarthritis, Total knee replacement, Qualitative research, Outcomes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ptjournalHome page
C. Jenkins, K. L Barker, H. Pandit, C. A. Dodd, and D. W Murray
After Partial Knee Replacement, Patients Can Kneel, But They Need to Be Taught to Do So: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2008; 88(9): 1012 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.