Skip Navigation

Rheumatology 2005 44(Supplement 3):iii2; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh729
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watts, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Watts, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?




Supplement Article

OP4. THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF GIANT CELL ARTERITIS

R. A. Watts

Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, UK

The incidence of GCA is highest in Scandinavia and populations of Nordic descent (e.g. Olmsted County, USA). The annual incidence in Scandinavia is 15–35/100,000 persons aged >50 years [1] and in Olmsted County 18.8/100,000 persons aged >50 years [2]. Studies from other regions of Europe report lower incidence rates. Multiple regression analysis suggests there is a significant trend to higher incidence with increasing latitude [1]. Some of the differences may reflect different diagnostic approaches in particular the biopsy rate and intensity of histological search for evidence of vasculitis. Many studies are hospital based and retrospective, and this will underestimate the incidence.

There have been few studies from non-white Caucasian populations. In Southern California a retrospective study from an ophthalmology unit of patients undergoing temporal artery biopsy [3] reported 19/66 white Caucasian patients had a positive biopsy, compared with 1/9 Asian, 0/40 Hispanic and 0/6 African-Americans. Few clinical details are provided and it is possible that referral bias might account for these results. A national survey from Japan reported a prevalence of 1.47/100,000 [4], considerably lower than European figures.

Several long-term studies have reported a steady increase in incidence [1]. In Olmsted County between 1950–54 and 1980–84 there was an increase from 6.7/100,000 to 28.5/100,000 persons aged >50 years. The rate then stabilized and has not risen further [2].


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.