Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on November 1, 2005
Rheumatology 2006 45(1):61-65; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kei099
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/1/61    most recent
kei099v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenwood, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, D. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenwood, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, D. V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A simple extension to the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RAQol) to explore individual patient concerns and monitor group outcome in clinical practice

M. C. Greenwood, A. J. Hakim and D. V. Doyle

The Academic Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Unit, Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust, Leytonstone, London E11 1NR, UK.

Correspondence to: M. C. Greenwood, The Academic Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Unit, Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust, Leytonstone, London E11 1NR, UK. E-mail: Mandy.Greenwood{at}whippsx.nhs.uk

Objectives. To find out if the RAQol, if extended by a qualifying question on the level of concern associated with each item, can function both as a group outcome measure and as a useful tool to identify the concerns of individual patients.

Methods. Thirty-seven rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients completed the questionnaire before and after starting a biological therapy. One hundred and forty-five others receiving routine care completed it at baseline, weeks 12 and 13 with EuroQol VAS and questions on global arthritis impact and any other concerns. Reproducibility was assessed in all 59 participants whose condition remained stable between weeks 12 and 13.

Results. The RAQol score was highly reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.986, n=59), reflected global RA impact (P = 0.000, n=140), negatively correlated with EuroQol VAS (Spearman coefficient=–0.639, two-tailed significance=0.000, n=142), responsive to biological therapy (two-tailed P= 0.000) and to increased global RA impact over 12 weeks (two-tailed P=0.012, n=37), and had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.94, n=143). The number of issues of great concern and their percentage contribution to the RAQol score were related to global arthritis impact (P=0.000 for both) and reduced by a biological therapy (two-tailed P=0.000 and 0.001 respectively). The mean kappa for consistency in identifying each item as a concern was 0.801 (range 0.633–0.921).

Conclusions. Use of the ‘extended’ RAQol in clinical practice could provide a valid and sensitive score for monitoring group outcome and a comprehensive and consistent list of an individual's main issues of concern to assist assessment of needs in routine clinical practice.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Quality of life, Questionnaire, Outcome measures, Responsiveness, Biologic therapies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.