Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on May 16, 2006
Rheumatology 2006 45(12):1566-1569; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel156
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/12/1566    most recent
kel156v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jois, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, D. G. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jois, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, D. G. I.
Related Collections
Right arrow Spondylarthropathies
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Low-dose infliximab treatment for ankylosing spondylitis—clinically- and cost-effective

R. N. Jois, J. Leeder, A. Gibb, K. Gaffney, A. Macgregor, M. Somerville and D. G. I. Scott

Department of Rheumatology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.

Correspondence to: Ramesh N. Jois, Department of Rheumatology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK. E-mail: rammi09{at}yahoo.com

Ojectives. Infliximab has been shown to be effective in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) when treated in a dose of 5 mg/kg at 6 weekly intervals. This dose of infliximab has not been determined by any structured randomized trials and has significant cost implications. We describe our experience of treating AS with low-dose infliximab (3mg/kg at 8 weekly intervals). The efficacy and cost implications are discussed.

Methods. Patients who had active AS [Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)≥ 4] were treated with infliximab 3 mg/kg at 0, 2, 6 weeks and thereafter at 8 weekly intervals. Response to treatment was defined as 50% improvement in BASDAI. Other response criteria such as ASAS 20, 40 and five of the six criteria were also assessed. Direct drug costs for infliximab were determined.

Results. Twenty-two consecutive AS patients received infliximab. All 22 completed treatment for 3 months, 15 patients for 6 months and 14 for 12 months. Mean age was 45 years (range 21–62) and mean disease duration 14.5 years (range 2–43). Of the patients, 54% achieved a 50% BASDAI response at 3 months and the benefit was sustained at 12 months in 63%. Similar response rate was seen with the other assessment criteria. Direct drug costs were significantly lower when low-dose infliximab regimen was used.

Conclusions. Low-dose infliximab (3 mg/kg at 8 weekly infusions) is effective in the treatment of AS. Higher doses are required in a small proportion of patients when treatment is only partially effective. Titrating the dose and frequency of infusions may be required in individual patients to achieve optimal response. Using low-dose infliximab has significant economic implications.

KEY WORDS: Ankylosing spondylitis, Infliximab, Anti-TNF therapy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
R. N. Jois, K. Gaffney, and A. Keat
Anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy for ankylosing spondylitis--unresolved issues
Rheumatology, June 1, 2007; 46(6): 899 - 901.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.