Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on November 15, 2005
Rheumatology 2006 45(4):459-464; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kei185
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/4/459    most recent
kei185v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dowson, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dowson, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diagnostics and Imaging Procedures
Right arrow Education
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Competence-based assessment of specialist registrars: evaluation of a new assessment of out-patient consultations

C. Dowson, A. Hassell on behalf of the members of the Training Sub-committee of the West Midlands Rheumatology Services and Training Committee (WMRSTC)

Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent and West Midlands Deanery, Birmingham Research Park, Birmingham, UK.

Correspondence to: C. Dowson, Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Hospital, High Lane, Burslem, Stoke-on-Trent ST6 7AG, UK. E-mail: Caitlyn.Dowson{at}uhns.nhs.uk

Objective. To implement and evaluate formal assessment of the performance of West Midlands rheumatology specialist registrars (SpRs) in conducting out-patient consultations.

Methods. SpRs conducted a full out-patient clinic while being observed by one or two consultants who scored each SpR's performance on a structured pro forma. The assessment was conducted within the examining consultant's hospital trust (in which the SpR was not working). The process was evaluated by trainees and trainers by means of a questionnaire.

Results. Sixteen SpRs were assessed. No trainee failed to reach the required standard. Six trainees scored ‘borderline’ for management planning and four had a borderline performance recorded for examination skills. Overall the process was valued by trainers and trainees, although consensus was that it would be more practicable for the trainee to be examined within the hospital in which they were working by a visiting consultant examiner. It was also felt that a broader range of scoring options would be preferable.

Conclusion. Formal assessment, by direct observation, of the skills of SpRs in conducting an out-patient clinic is practicable and offers information which is useful to trainer and trainee. A culture of direct observation of performance can be achieved within the context of rheumatology higher medical training.

KEY WORDS: Competence, Assessment, Specialist registrar, Out-patient, Consultation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.